Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23239265›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2013

Optimal management of brain metastases from breast cancer. Issues and considerations.

Rupert Bartsch, Anna S Berghoff, Matthias Preusser

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trastuzumab plus capecitabine vs. lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with trastuzumab resistance and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Trial
  2. Real-world application ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. New developments in brain metastases.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rupert BartschDepartment of Medicine I, Clinical Division of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Anna S Berghoff
Matthias Preusser
Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of brain metastases (BM) in breast cancer patients has increased over the last decade, presumably due to advances in systemic treatment. Today, breast cancer is the second most common cause of BM among all solid malignancies, second only to lung cancer; furthermore, it is the most common cause of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. The HER2-positive subtype was consistently shown to have a higher risk for BM as compared with HER2-negative disease. More recently, however, it was shown that a similar incidence exists in triple-negative tumours. Local treatment options, radiotherapy and neurosurgical resection, remain the mainstay of therapy for BM. While some studies have suggested a direct effect of conventional chemotherapy on BM, the main beneficial aspect of systemic treatment is rather due to control of non-CNS systemic disease. Importantly, in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving HER2-targeted therapy after local treatment for BM, superior survival outcomes were reported. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis has a dismal prognosis. Survival with whole brain radiotherapy alone remains short and the potential additional benefit of intrathecal chemotherapy is still disputed. According to case reports, intrathecal administration of trastuzumab appears to be a promising strategy in patients with HER2-positive leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. In conclusion, while the outcome of breast cancer patients with BM has improved especially in the HER2-positive subtype, the prognosis for the majority of patients remains poor. Therefore, development of novel systemic treatment options offering activity within the brain is urgently warranted. Novel insights into the pathobiology of BM formation may offer the possibility for targeted drug prophylaxis of CNS involvement in high-risk patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPrognosisAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23239265
OpenAlexW1278903895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.