Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2013
A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer.
Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical data mining reveals analgesic effects of lapatinib in cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic Review of the Side Effects Associated With Anti-HER2-Targeted Therapies Used in the Treatment of Breast Cancer, on Behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group.Targeted oncology · 2016Pooled it
- Congestive heart failure risk in cancer patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Pooled it
- Virtual Screening and Biological Evaluation of T22306 as a Potent Third-generation EGFR Inhibitor for NSCLC Treatment.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Virtual Screening, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, and Bioactivity Assessment Validate T13074 as a Dual-target EGFR/c-Met Inhibitor.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Determining M2 macrophages content for the anti-tumor effects of metal-organic framework-encapsulated pazopanib nanoparticles in breast cancer.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Targeting Angiogenesis in Breast Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives of Novel Anti-Angiogenic Approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Update on systemic treatment for newly diagnosed inflammatory breast cancer.Journal of advanced research · 2021Review
- Review
- Early relapse of inflammatory breast carcinoma treated with lapatinib and capecitabine: Ten years of complete response.The breast journal · 2020Article
- Toward precision medicine in inflammatory breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2019Review
- Theoretical study on the mechanism of N- and α-carbon oxidation of lapatinib catalyzed by cytochrome P450 monooxygenase.Journal of molecular modeling · 2019Article
- Inflammatory breast cancer: no longer an absolute contraindication for breast conservation surgery following good response to neoadjuvant therapy.Gland surgery · 2018Review
- Targeting protein quality control pathways in breast cancer.BMC biology · 2017Review
- Developmental therapeutics for inflammatory breast cancer: Biology and translational directions.Oncotarget · 2017Review
- Therapy for Cancer: Strategy of Combining Anti-Angiogenic and Target Therapies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2017Review
- Review
- Efficacy and mechanism of action of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib, lapatinib and neratinib in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: preclinical and clinical evidence.American journal of cancer research · 2015Review
- Phase I study of weekly paclitaxel in combination with pazopanib and lapatinib in advanced solid malignancies.British journal of cancer · 2014Article
- Antiangiogenesis therapy for breast cancer: an update and perspectives from clinical trials.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This multi-center Phase II study evaluated lapatinib, pazopanib, and the combination in patients with relapsed HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer. In Cohort 1, 76 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive lapatinib 1,500 mg + placebo or lapatinib 1,500 mg + pazopanib 800 mg (double-blind) once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Due to high-grade diarrhea observed with this dose combination in another study (VEG20007), Cohort 1 was closed. The protocol was amended such that an additional 88 patients (Cohort 2) were randomized in a 5:5:2 ratio to receive daily monotherapy lapatinib 1,500 mg, lapatinib 1,000 mg + pazopanib 400 mg, or monotherapy pazopanib 800 mg, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. In Cohort 1, ORR for the lapatinib (n = 38) and combination (n = 38) arms was 29 and 45 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.1 and 14.3 weeks, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the combination arm (71 %) than in the lapatinib arm (24 %). Dose reductions and interruptions due to AEs were also more frequent in the combination arm (45 and 53 %, respectively) than in the lapatinib monotherapy arm (0 and 11 %, respectively). In Cohort 2, ORR for patients treated with lapatinib (n = 36), lapatinib + pazopanib (n = 38), and pazopanib (n = 13) was 47, 58, and 31 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.0, 16.0, and 11.4 weeks, respectively. In the lapatinib, combination, and pazopanib therapy arms, grade ≥3 AEs were reported for 17, 50, and 46 % of patients, respectively, and the incidence of discontinuations due to AEs was 0, 24, and 23 %, respectively. The lapatinib-pazopanib combination was associated with a numerically higher ORR but no increase in PFS compared to lapatinib alone. The combination also had increased toxicity resulting in more dose reductions, modifications, and treatment delays. Activity with single-agent lapatinib was confirmed in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.