Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23239148›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2013

Mind the gap: racial differences in breast cancer incidence and biologic phenotype, but not stage, among low-income women participating in a government-funded screening program.

Joan E Cunningham, Christine A Walters, Elizabeth G Hill, Marvella E Ford, Tiffany Barker-Elamin, Charles L Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joan E CunninghamDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, and Hollings Cancer Center, 135 Cannon Street, Suite 300, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. cunninj@musc.edu
Christine A Walters
Elizabeth G Hill
Marvella E Ford
Tiffany Barker-Elamin
Charles L Bennett

Funding

NATIONAL CANCER PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROGRAMU58DP000770 · DP · SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI BYRD, MICHEAL · 2007 to 2011
$21.9M
SC Cancer Disparities Research Center (2 of 2)P20CA157071 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FORD, MARVELLA ELIZABETH, SALLEY, JUDITH · 2011 to 2014
$835k
Age-specific and age-standardized breast cancer subtype incidence and disparitiesR03CA137826 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CUNNINGHAM, JOAN E · 2009 to 2010
$148k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5U58DP000770-05NCI NIH HHS 5R03CA137826-02NCI NIH HHS P20 CA157071NCI NIH HHS R03 CA137826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer mortality rates in South Carolina (SC) are 40 % higher among African-American (AA) than European-American (EA) women. Proposed reasons include race-associated variations in care and/or tumor characteristics, which may be subject to income effects. We evaluated race-associated differences in tumor biologic phenotype and stage among low-income participants in a government-funded screening program. Best Chance Network (BCN) data were linked with the SC Central Cancer Registry. Characteristics of breast cancers diagnosed in BCN participants aged 47-64 years during 1996-2006 were abstracted. Race-specific case proportions and incidence rates based on estrogen receptor (ER) status and histologic grade were estimated. Among 33,880 low-income women accessing BCN services, repeat breast cancer screening utilization was poor, especially among EAs. Proportionally, stage at diagnosis did not differ by race (607 cancers, 53 % among AAs), with about 40 % advanced stage. Compared to EAs, invasive tumors in AAs were 67 % more likely (proportions) to be of poor-prognosis phenotype (both ER-negative and high-grade); this was more a result of the 46 % lesser AA incidence (rates) of better-prognosis (ER+ lower-grade) cancer than the 32 % greater incidence of poor-prognosis disease (p values <0.01). When compared to the general SC population, racial disparities in poor-prognostic features within the BCN population were attenuated; this was due to more frequent adverse tumor features in EAs rather than improvements for AAs. Among low-income women in SC, closing the breast cancer racial and income mortality gaps will require improved early diagnosis, addressing causes of racial differences in tumor biology, and improved care for cancers of poor-prognosis biology.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPovertyReceptors, EstrogenSouth CarolinaWhite PeopleReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID23239148
PMCPMC3660400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.