Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23239132›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2013

Over-expectation generated in a complex appetitive goal-tracking task is capable of inducing memory reconsolidation.

Amy C Reichelt, Jonathan L C Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reconsolidation of a well-learned instrumental memory.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2014
    Article
  11. Ventral tegmental dopamine dysregulation prevents appetitive memory destabilization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amy C ReicheltSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 3JX, UK. a.reichelt@unsw.edu.au
Jonathan L C Lee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDiscrepancies in an expected outcome have been demonstrated to result in modification of behaviour in both appetitive and aversive conditioning settings.

objectivesIn this study, we sought to establish whether overexpectation generated from compound conditioning with two previously rewarded stimuli was able to induce memory destabilisation and subsequent reconsolidation in a Pavlovian conditioned approach setting.

resultsIt was shown that 4 days, but not 1 day, of overexpectation training was required to induce memory reconsolidation, and this was disrupted by application of the NMDA subtype of glutamate receptor antagonist MK-801 prior to overexpectation training, but not by MK-801 application 6 h post-training.

conclusionsThese data provide evidence that the memories underlying Pavlovian conditioned approach do undergo reconsolidation and that such reconsolidation can be triggered by overexpectation. Therefore, the updating of appetitive conditioned stimulus and unconditioned stimulus associations underpinning conditioned responding in manners other than extinction training is likely achieved through memory reconsolidation.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsAppetiteConditioning, ClassicalDizocilpine MaleateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsExtinction, PsychologicalMaleMemoryRatsTime FactorsDizocilpine MaleateExcitatory Amino Acid Antagonists

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.