SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2013
A meta-analysis of an association between the XRCC1 polymorphisms and gliomas risk.
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reappraisal of XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism and glioma risk: a cumulative meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- DNA repair gene ERCC1 polymorphisms may contribute to the risk of glioma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Pooled it
- NOTCH3 gene polymorphism is associated with the prognosis of gliomas in Chinese patients.Medicine · 2015Article
- Association between X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 gene polymorphisms and glioma risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on 22 case-control studies.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The associations of the X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) Arg194Trp, Arg280His, Arg399Gln with the risk of gliomas have been studied recently, but contradictions exist whether the XRCC1 SNPs were a risk factor. We examined these associations by performing a meta-analyse. Nine studies tested the associations between XRCC1 SNPs and gliomas were retrieved. Overall odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals were estimated using genetic models. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated. The pooled OR for Arg194Trp TT versus CC were significant, which was 2.208 (95 % CI: 1.099, 4.435; P = 0.026), but it was non-significant after removal of the studies which deviated from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). The pooled OR for Arg399Gln AA+GA versus GG of genotype methods subgroup and the low study appraisal score subgroup were significant in the stratification analysis, but the meta-regression results were non-significance. No significant associations were found between the Arg280His SNPs and gliomas' risk. There was no evidence of publication bias. We conclude that SNPs in XRCC1 are not associated with the risk of gliomas. We should do more work on the relevant variants like those in TERT, RTEL1, EGFR, CDKN2A, CCDC26, and PHLDB1 and their products rather than the XRCC1. More GWAS will also need to involve sufficiently larger study populations along with analysis of tumor or gender subtypes in order to assess these risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.