Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23238879›Full record

Trial reportTargeted oncology2013

Predicting everolimus treatment efficacy in patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma: a GINECO group study.

Olivier Trédan, Isabelle Treilleux, Qing Wang, Nicolas Gane, Daniel Pissaloux, Nathalie Bonnin, Thierry Petit, Jacques Cretin, Nathalie Bonichon-Lamichhane, Frank Priou and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Targeted oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Rare Hereditary Gynecological Cancer Syndromes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base.JCO precision oncology · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. PI3K pathway dependencies in endometrioid endometrial cancer cell lines.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Olivier TrédanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon, 69008, France, olivier.tredan@lyon.unicancer.fr.
Isabelle Treilleux
Qing Wang
Nicolas Gane
Daniel Pissaloux
Nathalie Bonnin
Thierry Petit
Jacques Cretin
Nathalie Bonichon-Lamichhane
Frank Priou
Sandrine Lavau-Denes
Véronique Mari
Gilles Freyer
Daniela Lebrun
Jérôme Alexandre
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Centre Léon Bérard · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon · FRArcagy Gineco · FRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRCentre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tivoli · BEDélégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Lyon Sud · FRHôpital Universitaire Dupuytren · FRInstitut Jean Godinot · FRLevi Strauss (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether the expression of various tumor biomarkers of the mTOR pathway predicts tumor response to everolimus in metastatic recurrent endometrial cancer. Tumor blocks from 44 patients of a phase II clinical trial receiving everolimus until progression or toxicity were collected and evaluated at 3 and 6 months for response. Thirty-six blocks were available for analysis of ER, PR, HER2, LKB1, PI3K, PTEN, pAKT, 4E-BP1, p4E-BP1, and S6RP expression by immunohistochemistry, PTEN deletion by FISH, and mutational status of K-RAS, PIK3CA, PTEN, and AKT1 genes. Twelve of 34 evaluable patients had partial response or stable disease (PR, SD) and 22 had progressive disease (PD). Immunohistochemistry showed that no protein expression could predict response to everolimus. Neither could loss of PTEN expression or PTEN deletion or PTEN mutation predict patient outcome. Thirty-one samples were assessable for K-RAS mutations (ten for PR+SD and 21 for PD). There are only four patients with K-RAS mutations and none of them responded to treatment. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were longer in patients without K-RAS mutations (PFS 3.12 ± 1.7 months versus 1.05 ± 0.4 months, p < 0.001; OS 9.28 ± 2.0 months versus 2.30 ± 1.4 months, p = 0.034). In conclusion, the level of expression of proteins of the PI3K/mTOR pathway tested in this study cannot predict response to everolimus. However, endometrial cancer patients with K-RAS mutations do not seem to derive benefit from everolimus treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsEndometrial NeoplasmsEverolimusFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPredictive Value of TestsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPTEN PhosphohydrolaseSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTreatment OutcomeAKT1 protein, humanAntineoplastic AgentsEverolimusMTOR protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID23238879
OpenAlexW2024675894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.