Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23238722›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Generation of intensity selectivity by differential synaptic tuning: fast-saturating excitation but slow-saturating inhibition.

Mu Zhou, Huizhong W Tao, Li I Zhang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus of the Rat: Representation of Complex Sounds in Ears Damaged by Acoustic Trauma.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015
    Article
  11. A model for non-monotonic intensity coding.Royal Society open science · 2015
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mu ZhouZilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Huizhong W Tao
Li I Zhang
Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology · ITInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics · RUUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Processing and transformation of visual signals in the superior colliculusR01EY019049 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TAO, HUIZHONG WHIT · 2008 to 2025
$9.2M
Thalamic Modulation of Auditory Cortical Processing via LPR01DC008983 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Li I Zhang · 2007 to 2026
$8.7M
Inhibitory circuitry mechanisms underlying visual cortical development and plastiR21EY022478 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TAO, HUIZHONG WHIT · 2012 to 2013
$441k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019049NEI NIH HHS R01EY019049NEI NIH HHS R21 EY022478NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008983NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC008983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensity defines one fundamental aspect of sensory information and is specifically represented in each sensory modality. Interestingly, only in the central auditory system are intensity-selective neurons evolved. These neurons are characterized by nonmonotonic response-level functions. The synaptic circuitry mechanisms underlying the generation of intensity selectivity from nonselective auditory nerve inputs remain largely unclear. Here, we performed in vivo whole-cell recordings from pyramidal neurons in the rat dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), where intensity selectivity first emerges along the auditory neuraxis. Our results revealed that intensity-selective cells received fast-saturating excitation but slow-saturating inhibition with intensity increments, whereas in intensity-nonselective cells excitation and inhibition were similarly slow-saturating. The differential intensity tuning profiles of the monotonic excitation and inhibition qualitatively determined the intensity selectivity of output responses. In addition, the selectivity was further strengthened by significantly lower excitation/inhibition ratios at high-intensity levels compared with intensity-nonselective neurons. Our results demonstrate that intensity selectivity in the DCN is generated by extracting the difference between tuning profiles of nonselective excitatory and inhibitory inputs, which we propose can be achieved through a differential circuit mediated by feedforward inhibition.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionCochlear NucleusFemaleNeural InhibitionPatch-Clamp TechniquesPyramidal CellsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySynapses

Identifiers

PMID23238722
PMCPMC3685279
OpenAlexW2169949310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.