Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23237942›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cell2012

Future challenges in single-molecule fluorescence and laser trap approaches to studies of molecular motors.

Mary Williard Elting, James A Spudich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cell, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DNA replication:Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  5. DNA replication machinery: Insights fromComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  6. Manipulation of Axonal Outgrowth via Exogenous Low Forces.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Quantifying mechanical force in axonal growth and guidance.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mary Williard EltingDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
James A Spudich

Funding

MYOSIN MOVEMENT IN VITRO: MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATIONR01GM033289 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SPUDICH, JAMES · 1985 to 2024
$13.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM33289NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM033289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-molecule analysis is a powerful modern form of biochemistry, in which individual kinetic steps of a catalytic cycle of an enzyme can be explored in exquisite detail. Both single-molecule fluorescence and single-molecule force techniques have been widely used to characterize a number of protein systems. We focus here on molecular motors as a paradigm. We describe two areas where we expect to see exciting developments in the near future: first, characterizing the coupling of force production to chemical and mechanical changes in motors, and second, understanding how multiple motors work together in the environment of the cell.

Indexed as

Cell MovementFluorescenceMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular Motor ProteinsOptical TweezersMolecular Motor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23237942
PMCPMC3800137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.