Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23237821›Full record

Trial reportJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association

Enhancing fire department home visiting programs: results of a community intervention trial.

Andrea C Gielen, Wendy Shields, Shannon Frattaroli, Eileen McDonald, Vanya Jones, David Bishai, Raymond O'Brocki, Elise C Perry, Barbara Bates-Hopkins, Pat Tracey and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. It Is Not the Batteries! Smoke Alarm Presence and Functionality 5 to 7 Years Postinstallation of Sealed Lithium Battery Alarms.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predictors of Participation in a Fire Department Community Canvassing Program.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrea C GielenJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Wendy Shields
Shannon Frattaroli
Eileen McDonald
Vanya Jones
David Bishai
Raymond O'Brocki
Elise C Perry
Barbara Bates-Hopkins
Pat Tracey
Stephanie Parsons

Funding

The Johns Hopkins Center For Injury Research and PolicyR49CE002466 · CE · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GIELEN, ANDREA C · 2014 to 2018
$3.9M
Community Partnerships for Child SafetyR01HD059216 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GIELEN, ANDREA C · 2008 to 2012
$3.4M
Dissemination Research in Child SafetyR18CE001339 · CE · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GIELEN, ANDREA C · 2007 to 2009
$1.3M
NCIPC CDC HHS R18 CE001339NCIPC CDC HHS R18CE001339NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE002466NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059216NICHD NIH HHS R01HD059216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of an enhanced fire department home visiting program on community participation and installation of smoke alarms, and describes the rate of fire and burn hazards observed in homes. Communities were randomly assigned to receive either a standard or enhanced home visiting program. Before implementing the program, 603 household surveys were completed to determine comparability between the communities. During a 1-year intervention period, 171 home visits took place with 8080 homes. At baseline, 60% of homes did not have working smoke alarms on every level, 44% had unsafe water temperatures, and 72% did not have carbon monoxide alarms. Residents in the enhanced community relative to those in the standard community were significantly more likely to let the fire fighters into their homes (75 vs 62%). Among entered homes, those in the enhanced community were significantly more likely to agree to have smoke alarms installed (95 vs 92%), to be left with a working smoke alarm on every level of the home (84 vs 78%), and to have more smoke alarms installed per home visited (1.89 vs 1.74). The high baseline rates of home hazards suggest that fire department home visiting programs should take an "all hazards" approach. Community health workers and community partnerships can be effective in promoting fire departments' fire and life safety goals. Public health academic centers should partner with the fire service to help generate evidence on program effectiveness that can inform decision making about resource allocation for prevention.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationFirefightersHousingSafetyBaltimoreBurnsCommunity ParticipationFiresHot TemperatureHumansSmoke Inhalation InjuryWater Supply

Identifiers

PMID23237821
PMCPMC3610828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.