Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23237456›Full record

Trial reportAddiction science & clinical practice2012

Testing the effects of brief intervention in primary care for problem drug use in a randomized controlled trial: rationale, design, and methods.

Antoinette Krupski, Jutta M Joesch, Chris Dunn, Dennis Donovan, Kristin Bumgardner, Sarah Peregrine Lord, Richard Ries, Peter Roy-Byrne

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00877331 (Brief Intervention in Primary Care for Problem Drug Use and Abuse), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00877331 nacompletednot on this map

Brief Intervention in Primary Care for Problem Drug Use and Abuse

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2009 to 2014Enrolled868ConditionsSubstance-Related DisordersArmsBrief intervention using motivational interviewing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A multivariate meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process and outcome.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rating motivational interviewing fidelity from thin slices.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Unhealthy drug use: how to screen, when to intervene.The Journal of family practice · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antoinette KrupskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington at Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA. krupski@u.washington.edu
Jutta M Joesch
Chris Dunn
Dennis Donovan
Kristin Bumgardner
Sarah Peregrine Lord
Richard Ries
Peter Roy-Byrne
Harborview Medical Center · USSeattle University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Brief Intervention in Primary Care for Problem Drug Use and AbuseR01DA026014 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ROY-BYRNE, PETER PAUL · 2008 to 2012
$4.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA substantial body of research has established the effectiveness of brief interventions for problem alcohol use. Following these studies, national dissemination projects of screening, brief intervention (BI), and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for alcohol and drugs have been implemented on a widespread scale in multiple states despite little existing evidence for the impact of BI on drug use for non-treatment seekers. This article describes the design of a study testing the impact of SBIRT on individuals with drug problems, its contributions to the existing literature, and its potential to inform drug policy. METHODS/

designThe study is a randomized controlled trial of an SBIRT intervention carried out in a primary care setting within a safety net system of care. Approximately 1,000 individuals presenting for scheduled medical care at one of seven designated primary care clinics who endorse problematic drug use when screened are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to BI versus enhanced care as usual (ECAU). Individuals in both groups are reassessed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after baseline. Self-reported drug use and other psychosocial measures collected at each data point are supplemented by urine analysis and public health-related data from administrative databases. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to the existing literature by providing evidence for the impact of BI on problem drug use based on a broad range of measures including self-reported drug use, urine analysis, admission to drug abuse treatment, and changes in utilization and costs of health care services, arrests, and death with the intent of informing policy and program planning for problem drug use at the local, state, and national levels.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00877331.

Indexed as

Research DesignClinical ProtocolsConfidentialityCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansInformed ConsentMass ScreeningMotivationPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID23237456
PMCPMC3598998
OpenAlexW2117306498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.