Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23237065›Full record

SynthesisReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2012

The optimal duration of progesterone supplementation in pregnant women after IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.

Xi-Ru Liu, Hua-Qiao Mu, Qi Shi, Xiao-Qiu Xiao, Hong-Bo Qi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Role of Dydrogesterone for Luteal Phase Support in Assisted Reproduction.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Key to Life: Physiological Role and Clinical Implications of Progesterone.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The inadequate corpus luteum.Reproduction & fertility · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Progesterone and the luteal phase: a requisite to reproduction.Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xi-Ru LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400016, China.
Hua-Qiao Mu
Qi Shi
Xiao-Qiu Xiao
Hong-Bo Qi
Chongqing Medical University · CNChongqing Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledcan improve the rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth, but the optimal duration of treatment remains controversial. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of early progesterone cessation on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing IVF/ICSI.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Chinese biomedicine (CBM) literature database, and the Wanfang database. The final search was performed in July 2012. All available randomised trials that compared the effects of early progesterone cessation with progesterone continuation during early pregnancy after IVF/ICSI were included. The main outcome measures were live birth rate, miscarriage rate and ongoing pregnancy rate. Fixed or random-effects models were chosen to calculate the risk ratio (RR).

resultsSix eligible studies with a total of 1,201 randomised participants were included in the final analysis. No statistically significant differences were detected between patients who underwent early progesterone cessation and those who received progesterone continuation for luteal phase support in terms of live birth rate (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.05), miscarriage rate (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.74-1.38) or ongoing pregnancy rate (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.90-1.05). These results did not change after a sensitivity analysis.

conclusionsThe currently available evidence suggests that progesterone supplementation beyond the first positive hCG test after IVF/ICSI might generally be unnecessary, although large-scale randomised controlled trials are needed to strengthen this conclusion.

Indexed as

Pregnancy RateFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPregnancyProgesteroneRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID23237065
PMCPMC3551800
OpenAlexW2152423098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.