ArticlePloS one2012
Mechanism analysis of acid tolerance response of bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BBMN 68 by gene expression profile using RNA-sequencing.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isolation and functional evaluation of Lacticaseibacillus casei HUMB07381 isolated from traditional khiki cheese as a potential probiotic candidate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Probiotic Development Strategy Centered on Stability and Regulatory Considerations.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Determining the Importance of the Stringent Response for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Virulence In Vivo.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Quorum Sensing via Autoinducer-2 Promotes Colonisation and Host Adaptation in B. bifidum PRL2010.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Review
- Study of the biosynthesis and functionality of polyphosphate in Bifidobacterium longum KABP042.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Pleiotropic Effects of Carbohydrate-Mediated Growth Rate Modifications inMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Insight into the acid tolerance mechanism ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Stress Response in Bifidobacteria.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022Review
- Genome-Wide Assessment of Stress-Associated Genes in Bifidobacteria.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Transcriptome analysis revealed growth phase-associated changes of a centenarian-originated probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis A6.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
- Review
- Low-Carbohydrate Tolerant LAB Strains Identified from Rumen Fluid: Investigation of Probiotic Activity and Legume Silage Fermentation.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Linoleic acid induces metabolic stress in the intestinal microorganism Bifidobacterium breve DSM 20213.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Exopolysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria: the manipulation of environmental stresses for industrial applications.AIMS microbiology · 2020Review
- Antimicrobial Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria Starters against Acid Tolerant, Antibiotic Resistant, and Potentially VirulentInternational journal of microbiology · 2019Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BBMN68 in response to oxidative shock.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Investigation of Growth Phase-Dependent Acid Tolerance in Bifidobacteria longum BBMN68.Current microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To analyze the mechanism of the acid tolerance response (ATR) in Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BBMN68, we optimized the acid-adaptation condition to stimulate ATR effectively and analyzed the change of gene expression profile after acid-adaptation using high-throughput RNA-Seq. After acid-adaptation at pH 4.5 for 2 hours, the survival rate of BBMN68 at lethal pH 3.5 for 120 min was increased by 70 fold and the expression of 293 genes were upregulated by more than 2 fold, and 245 genes were downregulated by more than 2 fold. Gene expression profiling of ATR in BBMN68 suggested that, when the bacteria faced acid stress, the cells strengthened the integrity of cell wall and changed the permeability of membrane to keep the H(+) from entering. Once the H(+) entered the cytoplasm, the cells showed four main responses: First, the F(0)F(1)-ATPase system was initiated to discharge H(+). Second, the ability to produce NH(3) by cysteine-cystathionine-cycle was strengthened to neutralize excess H(+). Third, the cells started NER-UVR and NER-VSR systems to minimize the damage to DNA and upregulated HtpX, IbpA, and γ-glutamylcysteine production to protect proteins against damage. Fourth, the cells initiated global response signals ((p)ppGpp, polyP, and Sec-SRP) to bring the whole cell into a state of response to the stress. The cells also secreted the quorum sensing signal (AI-2) to communicate between intraspecies cells by the cellular signal system, such as two-component systems, to improve the overall survival rate. Besides, the cells varied the pathways of producing energy by shifting to BCAA metabolism and enhanced the ability to utilize sugar to supply sufficient energy for the operation of the mechanism mentioned above. Based on these reults, it was inferred that, during industrial applications, the acid resistance of bifidobacteria could be improved by adding BCAA, γ-glutamylcysteine, cysteine, and cystathionine into the acid-stress environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.