Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23236393›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Mechanism analysis of acid tolerance response of bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BBMN 68 by gene expression profile using RNA-sequencing.

Junhua Jin, Bing Zhang, Huiyuan Guo, Jianyun Cui, Lu Jiang, Shuhui Song, Min Sun, Fazheng Ren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Probiotic Development Strategy Centered on Stability and Regulatory Considerations.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Insight into the acid tolerance mechanism ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Stress Response in Bifidobacteria.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022
    Review
  11. Genome-Wide Assessment of Stress-Associated Genes in Bifidobacteria.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Microorganisms · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junhua JinKey Laboratory of Functional Dairy, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Bing Zhang
Huiyuan Guo
Jianyun Cui
Lu Jiang
Shuhui Song
Min Sun
Fazheng Ren
China Agricultural University · CNBeijing Institute of Genomics · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyze the mechanism of the acid tolerance response (ATR) in Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BBMN68, we optimized the acid-adaptation condition to stimulate ATR effectively and analyzed the change of gene expression profile after acid-adaptation using high-throughput RNA-Seq. After acid-adaptation at pH 4.5 for 2 hours, the survival rate of BBMN68 at lethal pH 3.5 for 120 min was increased by 70 fold and the expression of 293 genes were upregulated by more than 2 fold, and 245 genes were downregulated by more than 2 fold. Gene expression profiling of ATR in BBMN68 suggested that, when the bacteria faced acid stress, the cells strengthened the integrity of cell wall and changed the permeability of membrane to keep the H(+) from entering. Once the H(+) entered the cytoplasm, the cells showed four main responses: First, the F(0)F(1)-ATPase system was initiated to discharge H(+). Second, the ability to produce NH(3) by cysteine-cystathionine-cycle was strengthened to neutralize excess H(+). Third, the cells started NER-UVR and NER-VSR systems to minimize the damage to DNA and upregulated HtpX, IbpA, and γ-glutamylcysteine production to protect proteins against damage. Fourth, the cells initiated global response signals ((p)ppGpp, polyP, and Sec-SRP) to bring the whole cell into a state of response to the stress. The cells also secreted the quorum sensing signal (AI-2) to communicate between intraspecies cells by the cellular signal system, such as two-component systems, to improve the overall survival rate. Besides, the cells varied the pathways of producing energy by shifting to BCAA metabolism and enhanced the ability to utilize sugar to supply sufficient energy for the operation of the mechanism mentioned above. Based on these reults, it was inferred that, during industrial applications, the acid resistance of bifidobacteria could be improved by adding BCAA, γ-glutamylcysteine, cysteine, and cystathionine into the acid-stress environment.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialAdenosine TriphosphatasesBifidobacteriumDNA, BacterialGene Expression ProfilingHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationRNA, BacterialSequence Analysis, RNAAdenosine TriphosphatasesDNA, BacterialRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23236393
PMCPMC3517610
OpenAlexW1984189842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.