Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23236275›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2012

Diverse lifestyles and strategies of plant pathogenesis encoded in the genomes of eighteen Dothideomycetes fungi.

Robin A Ohm, Nicolas Feau, Bernard Henrissat, Conrad L Schoch, Benjamin A Horwitz, Kerrie W Barry, Bradford J Condon, Alex C Copeland, Braham Dhillon, Fabian Glaser and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 293 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
293citing papers in PubMed
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

293 citing papers in PubMed, 638 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Time-Course Comparative Transcriptomics Between Isolates ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The poplar pathogenMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  8. Antifungal activity of the culture filtrate ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

233 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 17 institutions in 6 countries.

Robin A OhmUnited States Department of Energy DOE Joint Genome Institute JGI, Walnut Creek, California, United States of America. raohm@lbl.gov
Nicolas Feau
Bernard Henrissat
Conrad L Schoch
Benjamin A Horwitz
Kerrie W Barry
Bradford J Condon
Alex C Copeland
Braham Dhillon
Fabian Glaser
Cedar N Hesse
Idit Kosti
Kurt LaButti
Erika A Lindquist
Susan Lucas
Asaf A Salamov
Rosie E Bradshaw
Lynda Ciuffetti
Richard C Hamelin
Gert H J Kema
Christopher Lawrence
James A Scott
Joseph W Spatafora
B Gillian Turgeon
Pierre J G M de Wit
Shaobin Zhong
Stephen B Goodwin
Igor V Grigoriev
United States Department of Energy · USOregon State University · USTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILJoint Genome Institute · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAAix-Marseille Université · FRCornell University · USMassey University · NZMolecular Sciences Software Institute · USNational Center for Biotechnology Information · USNatural Resources Canada · CANorth Dakota State University · USPlant (United States) · USPublic Health Ontario · CAResearch International (United States) · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The class Dothideomycetes is one of the largest groups of fungi with a high level of ecological diversity including many plant pathogens infecting a broad range of hosts. Here, we compare genome features of 18 members of this class, including 6 necrotrophs, 9 (hemi)biotrophs and 3 saprotrophs, to analyze genome structure, evolution, and the diverse strategies of pathogenesis. The Dothideomycetes most likely evolved from a common ancestor more than 280 million years ago. The 18 genome sequences differ dramatically in size due to variation in repetitive content, but show much less variation in number of (core) genes. Gene order appears to have been rearranged mostly within chromosomal boundaries by multiple inversions, in extant genomes frequently demarcated by adjacent simple repeats. Several Dothideomycetes contain one or more gene-poor, transposable element (TE)-rich putatively dispensable chromosomes of unknown function. The 18 Dothideomycetes offer an extensive catalogue of genes involved in cellulose degradation, proteolysis, secondary metabolism, and cysteine-rich small secreted proteins. Ancestors of the two major orders of plant pathogens in the Dothideomycetes, the Capnodiales and Pleosporales, may have had different modes of pathogenesis, with the former having fewer of these genes than the latter. Many of these genes are enriched in proximity to transposable elements, suggesting faster evolution because of the effects of repeat induced point (RIP) mutations. A syntenic block of genes, including oxidoreductases, is conserved in most Dothideomycetes and upregulated during infection in L. maculans, suggesting a possible function in response to oxidative stress.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAscomycotaChromosomes, FungalDNA Transposable ElementsGenes, FungalOxidative StressPlant DiseasesPoint MutationDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID23236275
PMCPMC3516569
OpenAlexW2140413947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.