ArticlePLoS computational biology2012
Ten simple rules for the open development of scientific software.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten quick tips to SNIFF out sustainable and secure scientific software.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Kauro, a graph-based chatbot for high-fidelity information transmission conversations.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Beyond beta rhythms: subthalamic aperiodic broadband power scales with Parkinson's disease severity-a cross-sectional multicentre study.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Variant scoring tools for deep mutational scanning.Molecular systems biology · 2025Review
- Sustainable software development in science - insights from 20 years of Vanted.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Challenging the status quo: A guide to open and reproducible neuroimaging for early career researchers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Reviewability and supportability: New complementary principles to empower research software practices.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Ten simple rules for training scientists to make better software.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Best practices to evaluate the impact of biomedical research software-metric collection beyond citations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules to make computable knowledge shareable and reusable.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Nickel-induced transcriptional memory in lung epithelial cells promotes interferon signaling upon nicotine exposure.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for working with other people's code.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Enhanced Surgeons: Understanding the Design of Augmented Reality Instructions for Keyhole Surgery.Proceedings. IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for providing bioinformatics support within a hospital.BioData mining · 2023Article
- More eyes on the prize: open-source data, software and hardware for advancing plant science through collaboration.AoB PLANTS · 2023Review
- Ten simple rules for reporting a bug.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- FASTAptameR 2.0: A web tool for combinatorial sequence selections.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2022Article
- Seven steps to enhance Open Science practices in animal science.PNAS nexus · 2022Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.