ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2014
Untangling perceptual memory: hysteresis and adaptation map into separate cortical networks.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural substrates of duration serial dependence: Putamen suppression of the prior duration trace.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Adaptive rightward gaze shifts support configural object recognition during perceptual challenge.iScience · 2026Article
- How sleep redraws phonemic categories after auditory selective adaptation.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Bistability and hysteresis in the proximity-based grouping of dot lattices.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Attractive and repulsive history effects in categorical and continuous estimates of orientation perception.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Process dynamics of serial biases in visual perception and working memory processes.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Exploring the role of serial dependence in visual time perception.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Neural mechanisms in resolving prior and likelihood uncertainty in scene recognition.iScience · 2025Article
- Reactivation of previous decisions repulsively biases sensory encoding but attractively biases decision-making.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Distinct serial dependence between small and large numerosity processing.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Violation of Leggett-Garg Inequality in Perceiving Cup-like Objects and Cognitive Contextuality.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Opposing serial effects of stimulus and choice in speech perception scale with context variability.iScience · 2024Article
- Temporal regularities shape perceptual decisions and striatal dopamine signals.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Continuity fields enhance visual perception through positive serial dependence.Nature reviews. Psychology · 2024Article
- Randomness impacts the building of specific priors, visual exploration, and perception in object recognition.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An efficient Bayesian observer model of attractive and repulsive temporal context effects when perceiving multistable dot lattices.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- The push-pull of serial dependence effects: Attraction to the prior response and repulsion from the prior stimulus.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Disentangling sensory precision and prior expectation of change in autism during tactile discrimination.NPJ science of learning · 2023Article
- Hysteresis reveals a happiness bias effect in dynamic emotion recognition from ambiguous biological motion.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Spatial correspondence in relative space regulates serial dependence.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perception is an active inferential process in which prior knowledge is combined with sensory input, the result of which determines the contents of awareness. Accordingly, previous experience is known to help the brain "decide" what to perceive. However, a critical aspect that has not been addressed is that previous experience can exert 2 opposing effects on perception: An attractive effect, sensitizing the brain to perceive the same again (hysteresis), or a repulsive effect, making it more likely to perceive something else (adaptation). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and modeling to elucidate how the brain entertains these 2 opposing processes, and what determines the direction of such experience-dependent perceptual effects. We found that although affecting our perception concurrently, hysteresis and adaptation map into distinct cortical networks: a widespread network of higher-order visual and fronto-parietal areas was involved in perceptual stabilization, while adaptation was confined to early visual areas. This areal and hierarchical segregation may explain how the brain maintains the balance between exploiting redundancies and staying sensitive to new information. We provide a Bayesian model that accounts for the coexistence of hysteresis and adaptation by separating their causes into 2 distinct terms: Hysteresis alters the prior, whereas adaptation changes the sensory evidence (the likelihood function).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.