Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23236008›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2013

Neural control of muscle force: indications from a simulation model.

Paola Contessa, Carlo J De Luca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ankle Torque Estimation With Motor Unit Discharges in Residual Muscles Following Lower-Limb Amputation.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Resistance exercise training and the motor unit.European journal of applied physiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. On the reliability and validity of central fatigue determination.European journal of applied physiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paola ContessaNeuroMuscular Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. contessa@bu.edu
Carlo J De Luca

Funding

Harnessing Motoneuron Activity: From Lab to ClinicR01HD050111 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI DE LUCA, CARLO J · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
Non-Invasive System for Identifying Neural BehaviorR01NS058250 · NINDS · ALTEC, INC. · PI DE LUCA, CARLO J · 2006 to 2009
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS HD-050111NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD050111NINDS NIH HHS NS-058250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a model to investigate the influence of the muscle force twitch on the simulated firing behavior of motoneurons and muscle force production during voluntary isometric contractions. The input consists of an excitatory signal common to all the motor units in the pool of a muscle, consistent with the "common drive" property. Motor units respond with a hierarchically structured firing behavior wherein at any time and force, firing rates are inversely proportional to recruitment threshold, as described by the "onion skin" property. Time- and force-dependent changes in muscle force production are introduced by varying the motor unit force twitches as a function of time or by varying the number of active motor units. A force feedback adjusts the input excitation, maintaining the simulated force at a target level. The simulations replicate motor unit behavior characteristics similar to those reported in previous empirical studies of sustained contractions: 1) the initial decrease and subsequent increase of firing rates, 2) the derecruitment and recruitment of motor units throughout sustained contractions, and 3) the continual increase in the force fluctuation caused by the progressive recruitment of larger motor units. The model cautions the use of motor unit behavior at recruitment and derecruitment without consideration of changes in the muscle force generation capacity. It describes an alternative mechanism for the reserve capacity of motor units to generate extraordinary force. It supports the hypothesis that the control of motoneurons remains invariant during force-varying and sustained isometric contractions.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsFeedbackHumansIsometric ContractionMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalRecruitment, Neurophysiological

Identifiers

PMID23236008
PMCPMC3602935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.