SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Antibiotic treatment for nontuberculous mycobacteria lung infection in people with cystic fibrosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotic treatment for non-tuberculous mycobacteria lung infection in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Antibiotic treatment for nontuberculous mycobacteria lung infection in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Antibiotic treatment for nontuberculous mycobacteria lung infection in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- A Rabbit Model to Study Antibiotic Penetration at the Site of Infection for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: Macrolide Case Study.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Pharmacokinetics of oral antimycobacterials and dosing guidance for Mycobacterium avium complex treatment in cystic fibrosis.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2021Article
- Update on host-pathogen interactions in cystic fibrosis lung disease.Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2016Article
- Current and Emerging Therapies for the Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis or Mitigation of Its Symptoms.Drugs in R&D · 2016Review
- Eradication ofGlobal pediatric health · 2016Article
- Management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis patients using inhaled antibiotics with a focus on nebulized liposomal amikacin.Future microbiology · 2015Review
- Infections in patients with cystic fibrosis: diagnostic microbiology update.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2014Review
- Shifting paradigms of nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis.Respiratory research · 2014Article
- Nontuberculous mycobacteria: the changing epidemiology and treatment challenges in cystic fibrosis.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNontuberculous mycobacteria are mycobacteria, other than those in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, and are commonly found in the environment. Nontuberculous mycobacteria species (most commonly Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium abscessus) are isolated from the respiratory tract of approximately 5% to 20% of individuals with cystic fibrosis; they can cause lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis leading to more a rapid decline in lung function and even death in certain circumstances. Although there are guidelines for the antimicrobial treatment of nontuberculous mycobacteria lung disease, these recommendations are not specific for people with cystic fibrosis and it is not clear which antibiotic regimen may be the most effective in the treatment of these patients.
objectivesThe objective of our review was to compare antibiotic treatment to no antibiotic treatment, or to compare different combinations of antibiotic treatment, for nontuberculous mycobacteria lung infections in people with cystic fibrosis. The primary objective was to assess the effect of treatment on lung function and pulmonary exacerbations and to quantify adverse events. The secondary objectives were to assess treatment effects on the amount of bacteria in the sputum, quality of life, mortality, nutritional parameters, hospitalizations and use of oral antibiotics. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and hand searching of journals and conference abstract books. Date of last search: 19 July 2012.We also searched a register of ongoing trials and the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Date of last search: 10 August 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any randomized controlled trials comparing nontuberculous mycobacteria antibiotics to no antibiotic treatment, as well as one nontuberculous mycobacteria antibiotic regimen compared to another nontuberculous mycobacteria antibiotic regimen, in individuals with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were not collected because no completed trials were identified by the searches. MAIN
resultsNo completed trials were identified by the searches, but one ongoing trial was identified, which may be eligible for inclusion in this review when completed. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review did not find any evidence for the effectiveness of different antimicrobial treatment for nontuberculous mycobacteria lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis. Until such evidence becomes available, it is reasonable for clinicians to follow the American Thoracic Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of nodular or bronchiectatic pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex or Mycobacterium abscessus in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.