SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy to improve caecal intubation.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03160859 (Prospective RCT of Water Exchange), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective RCT of Water Exchange (WE) vs. WE Plus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy during transendoscopic enteral tubing: A randomized controlled trial.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Trial
- Use of a Transparent Cap Increases the Diagnostic Yield in Antegrade Single-Balloon Enteroscopy for Obscure GI Bleed.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Trial
- The use of a transparent cap in sigmoidoscopy-A randomized controlled clinical trial on pain, time and success rate.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2017Trial
- Review
- Efficacy of a small-caliber colonoscope for pain in female patients during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Standards of diagnostic colonoscopy for early-stage neoplasia: Recommendations by an Asian private group.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2019Article
- Cap-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: is the cap beneficial? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Annals of gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Tips and tricks for better endoscopic treatment of colorectal tumors: usefulness of cap and band in colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection.Clinical endoscopy · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColonoscopy is considered the gold-standard investigation for screening and diagnosis of colorectal cancer. It is also becoming increasingly desirable for assessment, management, diagnosis and follow-up of other colorectal diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases and acute diverticulitis. Hence, due to the increasing demand for colonoscopy, devices to advance examination techniques are highly sought-after and the colonoscope with the transparent cap could be one of these.
objectivesTo identify and review all relevant data in order to determine whether colonoscopy with a transparent cap is a more effective diagnostic tool than colonoscopy. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of colonoscopy with a transparent cap with standard colonoscopy. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials which compared the use of colonoscopy with a transparent cap with standard colonoscopy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on study methods, participants, interventions used and outcomes measured was extracted from each study. Data was entered into the Cochrane Review Manager software (RevMan 5.0, 2008) and analysed using Cochrane MetaView. MAIN
resultsIn the present meta-analysis, we considered 14 randomised controlled trials so far published. The findings of our work indicate that colonoscopy with transparent cap has a faster caecal intubation time when compared with standard colonoscopy. Reviewing studies individually would also seem to favour colonoscopy with transparent cap for polyp detection rate and pain during procedure but due to lack of comparable data meta-analysis was not feasible. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review suggests that a transparent cap on the end of the colonoscope may give a marginally faster caecal intubation time compared with standard colonoscopy. It also suggests that there is a better polyp detection rate and less pain with the cap. However, the authors feel that further randomised controlled trials in this area would provide more clinically significant information on this adjunct to colonoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.