SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Inhaled steroids for acute asthma following emergency department discharge.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03369847 (Initiating Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy at Discharge From the Pediatric Emergency Department to Prevent Asthma Relapse), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Initiating Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy at Discharge From the Pediatric Emergency Department to Prevent Asthma Relapse: A Randomized Control Trial
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early use of inhaled corticosteroids in the emergency department treatment of acute asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Asthma in adults (acute).BMJ clinical evidence · 2011Pooled it
- Inhaled magnesium versus inhaled salbutamol in rescue treatment for moderate and severe asthma exacerbations in pediatric patients.Jornal de pediatriaTrial
- Are acute asthma presentations to the emergency department an opportunity for optimising long-term management? A qualitative study on beliefs and behaviours of healthcare professionals.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2025Article
- Expert consensus on the use of systemic glucocorticoids for managing eosinophil-related diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Inter-society consensus for the use of inhaled corticosteroids in infants, children and adolescents with airway diseases.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
- Management of severe asthma exacerbation: guidelines from the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française and the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies.Annals of intensive care · 2019Review
- Guideline on management of the acute asthma attack in children by Italian Society of Pediatrics.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2018Review
- Factors associated with relapse in adult patients discharged from the emergency department following acute asthma: a systematic review.BMJ open respiratory research · 2017Article
- Guidelines for diagnosis and management of bronchial asthma: Joint ICS/NCCP (I) recommendations.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2015Article
- Pharmacotherapy of critical asthma syndrome: current and emerging therapies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2015Review
- Corticosteroids in the treatment of acute asthma.Annals of thoracic medicine · 2014Review
- Common pediatric respiratory emergencies.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2012Review
- Asthma Exacerbations: Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Treatment.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practiceReview
- Update on the utility of corticosteroids in acute pediatric respiratory disorders.Allergy and asthma proceedingsReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with acute asthma treated in the emergency department (ED) are frequently treated with inhaled beta(2)-agonists and systemic corticosteroids after discharge. The use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) following discharge may also be beneficial in improving patient outcomes after acute asthma.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of ICS on outcomes in the treatment of acute asthma following discharge from the ED. To quantify the effectiveness of ICS therapy on acute asthma following ED discharge, when used in addition to, or as a substitute for, systemic corticosteroids. SEARCH
methodsControlled clinical trials (CCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Airways Review Group register, which consists of systematic searches of EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases supplemented by handsearching of respiratory journals and conference proceedings. In addition, primary authors and pharmaceutical companies were contacted to identify eligible studies. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts also were searched. The searches have been conducted up to September 2012 SELECTION CRITERIA: We included both randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Studies were included if patients were treated for acute asthma in the ED or its equivalent, and following ED discharge were treated with ICS therapy either in addition to, or as a substitute for, oral corticosteroids. Two review authors independently assessed articles for potential relevance, final inclusion and methodological quality. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two review authors, or confirmed by the study authors. Several authors and pharmaceutical companies provided unpublished data. The data were analysed using the Cochrane Review Manager software. Where appropriate, individual and pooled dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratios (OR) or relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Where appropriate, individual and pooled continuous outcomes were reported as mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs. The primary analysis employed a fixed effect model and heterogeneity is reported using I-squared (I(2)) statistics. MAIN
resultsTwelve trials were eligible for inclusion. Three of these trials, involving a total of 909 patients, compared ICS plus systemic corticosteroids versus oral corticosteroid therapy alone. There was no demonstrated benefit of ICS therapy when used in addition to oral corticosteroid therapy in the trials. Relapses were reduced; however, this was not statistically significant with the addition of ICS therapy (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.02; 3 studies; N = 909). In addition, no statistically significant differences were demonstrated between the two groups for relapses requiring admission, quality of life, symptom scores or adverse effects.Nine trials, involving a total of 1296 patients compared high-dose ICS therapy alone versus oral corticosteroid therapy alone after ED discharge. There were no significant differences demonstrated between ICS therapy alone versus oral corticosteroid therapy alone for relapse rates (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.52; 4 studies; N = 684), admissions to hospital, or in the secondary outcomes of beta(2)-agonist use, symptoms or adverse events. However, the sample size was not adequate to exclude the possibility of either treatment being significantly inferior and people with severe asthma were excluded from these trials. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence that ICS therapy provides additional benefit when used in combination with standard systemic corticosteroid therapy upon ED discharge for acute asthma. There is some evidence that high-dose ICS therapy alone may be as effective as oral corticosteroid therapy when used in mild asthmatics upon ED discharge; however, the confidence intervals were too wide to be confident of equal effectiveness. Further research is needed to clarify whether ICS therapy should be employed in acute asthma treatment following ED discharge. The review does not suggest any reason to stop usual treatment with ICS following ED discharge, even if a course of oral corticosteroids are prescribed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.