Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23235590›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Inhaled steroids for acute asthma following emergency department discharge.

Marcia L Edmonds, Stephen J Milan, Barry E Brenner, Carlos A Camargo, Brian H Rowe

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03369847 (Initiating Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy at Discharge From the Pediatric Emergency Department to Prevent Asthma Relapse), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03369847 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Initiating Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy at Discharge From the Pediatric Emergency Department to Prevent Asthma Relapse: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York City Health and Hospitals CorporationRan2017 to 2019Enrolled43ConditionsAsthma, Pediatric ALLArmsbudesonide, beclomethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Asthma in adults (acute).BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Corticosteroids in the treatment of acute asthma.Annals of thoracic medicine · 2014
    Review
  13. Common pediatric respiratory emergencies.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2012
    Review
  14. Asthma Exacerbations: Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Treatment.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcia L EdmondsSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Canada. medmonds@ualberta.ca
Stephen J Milan
Barry E Brenner
Carlos A Camargo
Brian H Rowe
Health Sciences Centre · CALancaster University · GBMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center · USWestern University · CA

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with acute asthma treated in the emergency department (ED) are frequently treated with inhaled beta(2)-agonists and systemic corticosteroids after discharge. The use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) following discharge may also be beneficial in improving patient outcomes after acute asthma.

objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of ICS on outcomes in the treatment of acute asthma following discharge from the ED. To quantify the effectiveness of ICS therapy on acute asthma following ED discharge, when used in addition to, or as a substitute for, systemic corticosteroids. SEARCH

methodsControlled clinical trials (CCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Airways Review Group register, which consists of systematic searches of EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases supplemented by handsearching of respiratory journals and conference proceedings. In addition, primary authors and pharmaceutical companies were contacted to identify eligible studies. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts also were searched. The searches have been conducted up to September 2012 SELECTION CRITERIA: We included both randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Studies were included if patients were treated for acute asthma in the ED or its equivalent, and following ED discharge were treated with ICS therapy either in addition to, or as a substitute for, oral corticosteroids. Two review authors independently assessed articles for potential relevance, final inclusion and methodological quality. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two review authors, or confirmed by the study authors. Several authors and pharmaceutical companies provided unpublished data. The data were analysed using the Cochrane Review Manager software. Where appropriate, individual and pooled dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratios (OR) or relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Where appropriate, individual and pooled continuous outcomes were reported as mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs. The primary analysis employed a fixed effect model and heterogeneity is reported using I-squared (I(2)) statistics. MAIN

resultsTwelve trials were eligible for inclusion. Three of these trials, involving a total of 909 patients, compared ICS plus systemic corticosteroids versus oral corticosteroid therapy alone. There was no demonstrated benefit of ICS therapy when used in addition to oral corticosteroid therapy in the trials. Relapses were reduced; however, this was not statistically significant with the addition of ICS therapy (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.02; 3 studies; N = 909). In addition, no statistically significant differences were demonstrated between the two groups for relapses requiring admission, quality of life, symptom scores or adverse effects.Nine trials, involving a total of 1296 patients compared high-dose ICS therapy alone versus oral corticosteroid therapy alone after ED discharge. There were no significant differences demonstrated between ICS therapy alone versus oral corticosteroid therapy alone for relapse rates (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.52; 4 studies; N = 684), admissions to hospital, or in the secondary outcomes of beta(2)-agonist use, symptoms or adverse events. However, the sample size was not adequate to exclude the possibility of either treatment being significantly inferior and people with severe asthma were excluded from these trials. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence that ICS therapy provides additional benefit when used in combination with standard systemic corticosteroid therapy upon ED discharge for acute asthma. There is some evidence that high-dose ICS therapy alone may be as effective as oral corticosteroid therapy when used in mild asthmatics upon ED discharge; however, the confidence intervals were too wide to be confident of equal effectiveness. Further research is needed to clarify whether ICS therapy should be employed in acute asthma treatment following ED discharge. The review does not suggest any reason to stop usual treatment with ICS following ED discharge, even if a course of oral corticosteroids are prescribed.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, InhalationAdministration, OralAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAsthmaEmergency Service, HospitalGlucocorticoidsHumansPatient DischargeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSteroidsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsGlucocorticoidsSteroids

Identifiers

PMID23235590
PMCPMC6513225
OpenAlexW1572847172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.