Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23235287›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2013

Butyrate-producing Clostridium cluster XIVa species specifically colonize mucins in an in vitro gut model.

Pieter Van den Abbeele, Clara Belzer, Margot Goossens, Michiel Kleerebezem, Willem M De Vos, Olivier Thas, Rosemarie De Weirdt, Frederiek-Maarten Kerckhof, Tom Van de Wiele

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 349 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
349citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

349 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 638 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-Analysis of the Gut Microbiome: An African American Representation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Microbiome-Modulating Effects of Heat-TreatedJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Decoding the power of the microbiome in human health.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Gut microbes · 2025
    Article

289 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pieter Van den AbbeeleLaboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Clara Belzer
Margot Goossens
Michiel Kleerebezem
Willem M De Vos
Olivier Thas
Rosemarie De Weirdt
Frederiek-Maarten Kerckhof
Tom Van de Wiele
Ghent University · BEWageningen University & Research · NLUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human gut is colonized by a complex microbiota with multiple benefits. Although the surface-attached, mucosal microbiota has a unique composition and potential to influence human health, it remains difficult to study in vivo. Therefore, we performed an in-depth microbial characterization (human intestinal tract chip (HITChip)) of a recently developed dynamic in vitro gut model, which simulates both luminal and mucosal gut microbes (mucosal-simulator of human intestinal microbial ecosystem (M-SHIME)). Inter-individual differences among human subjects were confirmed and microbial patterns unique for each individual were preserved in vitro. Furthermore, in correspondence with in vivo studies, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria were enriched in the luminal content while Firmicutes rather colonized the mucin layer, with Clostridium cluster XIVa accounting for almost 60% of the mucin-adhered microbiota. Of the many acetate and/or lactate-converting butyrate producers within this cluster, Roseburia intestinalis and Eubacterium rectale most specifically colonized mucins. These 16S rRNA gene-based results were confirmed at a functional level as butyryl-CoA:acetate-CoA transferase gene sequences belonged to different species in the luminal as opposed to the mucin-adhered microbiota, with Roseburia species governing the mucosal butyrate production. Correspondingly, the simulated mucosal environment induced a shift from acetate towards butyrate. As not only inter-individual differences were preserved but also because compared with conventional models, washout of relevant mucin-adhered microbes was avoided, simulating the mucosal gut microbiota represents a breakthrough in modeling and mechanistically studying the human intestinal microbiome in health and disease. Finally, as mucosal butyrate producers produce butyrate close to the epithelium, they may enhance butyrate bioavailability, which could be useful in treating diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAcyl Coenzyme AAdultButyratesClostridiumColonEcosystemFecesGastrointestinal TractHumansIntestinal MucosaMaleMonte Carlo MethodMucinsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAcyl Coenzyme AButyratesbutyryl-coenzyme AMucinsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID23235287
PMCPMC3635240
OpenAlexW2051312690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.