Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23235196›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2013

Altered hypothalamic response to food in smokers.

Paul Y Geha, Katja Aschenbrenner, Jennifer Felsted, Stephanie S O'Malley, Dana M Small

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Good practice in food-related neuroimaging.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019
    Article
  18. Neural vulnerability factors for obesity.Clinical psychology review · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul Y GehaJohn B Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
Katja Aschenbrenner
Jennifer Felsted
Stephanie S O'Malley
Dana M Small
John B. Pierce Laboratory · US

Funding

TOBACCO DEPENDENCE AND RISK FACTORS FOR TREATMENT FAILURP50DA013334 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI O'MALLEY, STEPHANIE S · 1999 to 2003
$8.0M
Improving Alcoholism TreatmentK05AA014715 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI O'MALLEY, STEPHANIE S · 2004 to 2013
$2.1M
Interactions Between Nicotine Addiction and Food RewardR03DA022292 · NIDA · JOHN B. PIERCE LABORATORY, INC. · PI SMALL, DANA M · 2006 to 2006
$231k
NIAAA NIH HHS KO5-AA014715NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA13334NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA022292-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking cessation is often followed by weight gain. Eating behaviors and weight change have been linked to the brain response to food, but it is unknown whether smoking influences this response.

objectiveWe determined the influence of smoking status (smokers compared with nonsmokers) on the brain response to food in regions associated with weight changes in nonsmokers.

designIn study 1, we used functional MRI (fMRI) to identify regions of the brain associated with weight change in nonsmokers. BMI and the brain response to a milk shake, which is a palatable and energy-dense food, were measured in a group of 27 nonsmokers (5 men). Sixteen subjects (3 men) returned 1 y later for BMI reassessment. The change in BMI was regressed against the brain response to isolate regions associated with weight change. In study 2, to determine whether smokers showed altered responses in regions associated with weight change, we assessed the brain response to a milk shake in 11 smokers. The brain response to a milk shake compared with a tasteless control solution was assessed in 11 smokers (5 men) in comparison with a group of age-, sex- and body weight-matched nonsmokers selected from the pool of nonsmokers who participated in study 1.

resultsThe response in the midbrain, hypothalamus, thalamus, and ventral striatum was positively associated with weight change at the 1-y follow-up in 16 nonsmokers. Compared with nonsmokers, smokers had a greater response to milk shakes in the hypothalamus.

conclusionSmokers display an altered brain response to food in the hypothalamus, which is an area associated with long-term weight change in nonsmokers.

Indexed as

AdultBody Mass IndexFeeding BehaviorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHungerHypothalamusLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSmokingWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID23235196
PMCPMC3522134
OpenAlexW2112977846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.