Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23234753›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2013

Using the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) effort index to predict treatment group attendance in patients with schizophrenia.

Raeanne C Moore, Taylor Davine, Alexandrea L Harmell, Veronica Cardenas, Barton W Palmer, Brent T Mausbach

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raeanne C MooreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0993, USA.
Taylor Davine
Alexandrea L Harmell
Veronica Cardenas
Barton W Palmer
Brent T Mausbach
University of California, San Diego · USSan Diego State University · US

Funding

FELLOWSHIP IN GERIATRIC MENTAL HEALTHT32MH019934 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Elizabeth W Twamley · 1994 to 2026
$9.5M
CORE--RESEARCH NETWORK DEVELOPMENT COREP30MH066248 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JESTE, DILIP V. · 2002 to 2006
$7.4M
Skills Training and Empowerment Program for Middle-Aged and Older Patients with PR01MH084967 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MAUSBACH, BRENT T · 2009 to 2013
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS 5P30MH066248NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH066248NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084967NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019934NIMH NIH HHS T32MH019934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a psychosocial treatment study, knowing which participants are likely to put forth adequate effort to maximize their treatment, such as attending group sessions and completing homework assignments, and knowing which participants need additional motivation before engagement in treatment is a crucial component to treatment success. This study examined the ability of the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Effort Index (EI), a newly developed measure of suboptimal effort that is embedded within the RBANS, to predict group attendance in a sample of 128 middle-aged and older adults with schizophrenia. This study was the first to evaluate the EI with a schizophrenia sample. While the EI literature recommends a cutoff score of >3 to be considered indicative of poor effort, a cutoff of >4 was identified as the optimal cutoff for this sample. Receiver Operating Characteristics curve analyses were conducted to determine if the EI could predict participants who had high versus low attendance. Results indicated that the EI was successfully able to discriminate between group attendance, and this measure of effort appears to be most valuable as a tool to identify participants who will have high attendance. Of interest, overall cognitive functioning and symptoms of psychopathology were not predictive of group attendance.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersNeuropsychological TestsOutcome Assessment, Health CareSchizophrenic PsychologyAdultBehavior TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID23234753
PMCPMC3568222
OpenAlexW2140749971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.