Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23234608›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012

Fast detection of de novo copy number variants from SNP arrays for case-parent trios.

Robert B Scharpf, Terri H Beaty, Holger Schwender, Samuel G Younkin, Alan F Scott, Ingo Ruczinski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Candidate pathway based analysis for cleft lip with or without cleft palate.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert B ScharpfDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. rscharp1@jhmi.edu
Terri H Beaty
Holger Schwender
Samuel G Younkin
Alan F Scott
Ingo Ruczinski
Johns Hopkins University · USHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Preprocessing and Analysis Tools for High-Throughput TechnologiesR01GM083084 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IRIZARRY, RAFAEL ANGEL · 2007 to 2018
$4.4M
International Consortium to Identify Genes and Interactions Controlling Oral ClefU01DE018993 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEATY, TERRI H · 2007 to 2008
$1.6M
Statistical methods for assessing copy number variation in SNP arraysR00HG005015 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHARPF, ROBERT B. · 2010 to 2012
$741k
Software for the statistical analysis of microarray probe level dataR01GM103552 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IRIZARRY, RAFAEL ANGEL · 2012 to 2013
$735k
Methods development and secondary analyses for an oral clefts association studyR03DE021437 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RUCZINSKI, INGO · 2011 to 2012
$477k
NHGRI NIH HHS HHSN268200782096CNHGRI NIH HHS R00HG005015NIDCR NIH HHS R03DE021437NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-018993NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083084NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM083084NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn studies of case-parent trios, we define copy number variants (CNVs) in the offspring that differ from the parental copy numbers as de novo and of interest for their potential functional role in disease. Among the leading array-based methods for discovery of de novo CNVs in case-parent trios is the joint hidden Markov model (HMM) implemented in the PennCNV software. However, the computational demands of the joint HMM are substantial and the extent to which false positive identifications occur in case-parent trios has not been well described. We evaluate these issues in a study of oral cleft case-parent trios.

resultsOur analysis of the oral cleft trios reveals that genomic waves represent a substantial source of false positive identifications in the joint HMM, despite a wave-correction implementation in PennCNV. In addition, the noise of low-level summaries of relative copy number (log R ratios) is strongly associated with batch and correlated with the frequency of de novo CNV calls. Exploiting the trio design, we propose a univariate statistic for relative copy number referred to as the minimum distance that can reduce technical variation from probe effects and genomic waves. We use circular binary segmentation to segment the minimum distance and maximum a posteriori estimation to infer de novo CNVs from the segmented genome. Compared to PennCNV on simulated data, MinimumDistance identifies fewer false positives on average and is comparable to PennCNV with respect to false negatives. Genomic waves contribute to discordance of PennCNV and MinimumDistance for high coverage de novo calls, while highly concordant calls on chromosome 22 were validated by quantitative PCR. Computationally, MinimumDistance provides a nearly 8-fold increase in speed relative to the joint HMM in a study of oral cleft trios.

conclusionsOur results indicate that batch effects and genomic waves are important considerations for case-parent studies of de novo CNV, and that the minimum distance is an effective statistic for reducing technical variation contributing to false de novo discoveries. Coupled with segmentation and maximum a posteriori estimation, our algorithm compares favorably to the joint HMM with MinimumDistance being much faster.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsChildCleft PalateGenome, HumanHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisParentsRegression AnalysisSoftware

Identifiers

PMID23234608
PMCPMC3576329
OpenAlexW1967463188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.