Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23234571›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2012

Multivariate methods and software for association mapping in dose-response genome-wide association studies.

Chad C Brown, Tammy M Havener, Marisa Wong Medina, Ronald M Krauss, Howard L McLeod, Alison A Motsinger-Reif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Beyond ICJournal of pharmacogenomics & pharmacoproteomics · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chad C BrownDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. motsinger@stat.ncsu.edu.
Tammy M Havener
Marisa Wong Medina
Ronald M Krauss
Howard L McLeod
Alison A Motsinger-Reif

Funding

Genetic Etiology of Cancer Drug ResponseR01CA161608 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI WILTSHIRE, TIM, WRIGHT, FRED A. · 2012 to 2021
$4.0M
Alternative Splicing in Regulation of Cholesterol Synthesis and UptakeR01HL104133 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RES CTR AT OAKLAND · PI MEDINA, MARISA WONG · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161608NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL104133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe large sample sizes, freedom of ethical restrictions and ease of repeated measurements make cytotoxicity assays of immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines a powerful new in vitro method in pharmacogenomics research. However, previous studies may have over-simplified the complex differences in dose-response profiles between genotypes, resulting in a loss of power.

methodsThe current study investigates four previously studied methods, plus one new method based on a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) design. A simulation study was performed using differences in cancer drug response between genotypes for biologically meaningful loci. These loci also showed significance in separate genome-wide association studies. This manuscript builds upon a previous study, where differences in dose-response curves between genotypes were constructed using the hill slope equation.

conclusionOverall, MANOVA was found to be the most powerful method for detecting real signals, and was also the most robust method for detection using alternatives generated with the previous simulation study. This method is also attractive because test statistics follow their expected distributions under the null hypothesis for both simulated and real data. The success of this method inspired the creation of the software program MAGWAS. MAGWAS is a computationally efficient, user-friendly, open source software tool that works on most platforms and performs GWASs for individuals having multivariate responses using standard file formats.

Identifiers

PMID23234571
PMCPMC3661384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.