ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2012
Acute burn resuscitation and fluid creep: it is time for colloid rehabilitation.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of enteral vs intravenous resuscitation for adults with major burn injuries in Nepal.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2025Trial
- Expanding the Limits of Burn Care: Survival After a 92% Total Body Surface Area Burn.European burn journal · 2025Article
- The impact of Albumin Administration on Mortality and Resuscitation Volume in Burn Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2025Review
- Critical Care of the Pediatric Burn Patient.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2024Review
- Medical and Surgical Care of Critical Burn Patients: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence and Practice.Cureus · 2022Review
- Sodium Balance Analysis In The Burn Resuscitation Period.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2022Article
- [Controlling excessive fluid resuscitation in massive burn patients to prevent complications].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022Article
- Bioresorbable scaffold as a dermal substitute.International journal of burns and trauma · 2017Article
- Management of burns in the elderly.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2016Article
- Acute kidney injury in critically burned patients resuscitated with a protocol that includes low doses of Hydroxyethyl Starch.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2016Article
- Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in a severely burned patient.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2015Article
- Albumin resuscitation in burns: a hybrid regime to mitigate fluid creep.Scars, burns & healingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid overloading has become a global phenomenon in acute burn care. The consensus Parkland formula that has excluded colloid use, the impact of goal-directed resuscitation, and the overzealous on the scene crystalloid resuscitation combined with subsequent inefficient titration of fluid administration and lack of timely reduction of infusion rates, have all contributed to this phenomenon of fluid overloading, known as fluid creep and recognized only recently, constituting a landmine in modern burn care. Solid evidence is supportive to the fact that excessive administration of crystalloid and the abandonment of colloid replenishment at some point of resuscitation are the major contributors to fluid creep. With available evidence from the literature, the present is a comprehensive review of literature about fluid creep, trying to determine the etiology behind it as well as to propose strategies to control its magnitude and complications, namely through colloid administration amongst other options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23233822PMC3506208What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.