Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23233427›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2012

Molecular identification in monophasic and nonmotile variants of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.

M Bugarel, M-L Vignaud, F Moury, P Fach, A Brisabois

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genotyping Study ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic Characterization ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  6. Emergence ofJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2019
    Article
  7. Pathogenicity and Competitive Fitness ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M BugarelFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health (ANSES), Laboratory for Food Safety, 23 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94706, Maisons-Alfort, France.
M-L Vignaud
F Moury
P Fach
A Brisabois
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variant strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, lacking one or both flagellar phases have been widely reported. The monophasic S.1,4,[5],12:i:- variant has emerged worldwide in the past few years and has become one of the most frequently encountered in many countries. In contrast, monophasic S.1,4,[5],12:-:1,2 and nonmotile S.1,4,[5],12:-:- strains are rarely described. This study investigated seven molecular markers to identify and delineate monophasic S.1,4,[5],12:i:- (n = 90), S.1,4,[5],12:-:1,2 (n = 25), nonmotile S.1,4,[5],12:-:- (n = 17) strains, and some serovar Typhimurium strains (n = 124) collected through the French Salmonella network between 2001 and 2010. Three markers were commonly detected in serovar Typhimurium and in all variant strains: STM2757, mdh and fliA-B. Monophasic S.1,4,[5],12:i:- were genotypically confirmed by the absence of the fljB, fljA, and hin genes. Nevertheless, 13 (14.5%) of them were positive for these last three genes, revealing monophasic strains named "inconsistent" as previously described. All nonmotile 1,4,[5],12:-:- strains had the fliC, fljA, fljB, and hin genes and the fliC gene was detected in 88% of monophasic S.1,4,[5],12:-:1,2 strains. The combination of the seven markers detection enables to recognize eight different genotypes within the S.1,4,[5],12:i:- collection, among which the Spanish and the U.S. clones previously described could be distinguished and assigned to a genotype. Based on this molecular approach, 71% of the French S.1,4,[5],12:i:- collection belonged to the Spanish clone, whereas only 2% were assigned to the U.S. clone. This study highlights the usefulness of these molecular markers and genotypes for identifying lineages, especially among the epidemiologically important monophasic S.1,4,[5],12:i:- variant.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialFranceGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationPolymerase Chain ReactionSalmonella typhimuriumBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID23233427
PMCPMC3535392
OpenAlexW1992372947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.