ArticleImmunogenetics2013
A similarity in peptide cross-reactivity between alloantigen- and nominal antigen-induced CD8+ T cell responses in vitro.
Article in Immunogenetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A strategy to reconstitute immunity without GVHD via adoptive allogeneic Tscm therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Antigen-specific CD8+ memory stem T cells generated from human peripheral blood effectively eradicate allogeneic targets in mice.Stem cell research & therapy · 2018Article
- Puerarin alleviates delayed-type hypersensitivity via cytokine inhibition by modulating Th1/Th2 balance.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Raising tumor-specific allorestricted T cells in vitro for adoptive transfusion is expected to circumvent host tumor tolerance. However, it has been assumed that alloreactive T cell clones activated in vitro ranges from peptide-specific with high avidity to peptide-degenerate with low avidity. In this study, we examined the peptide specificity and cross-reactivity of T cell responses in vitro to an allogeneic epitope and a nominal epitope with a modified co-culture of lymphocytes and autologous monocytes. After binding to the monocyte via the interaction of its Fc part and the cell surface IgG Fc receptor type I (FcγRI), a fusion protein consisting of the extracellular domains of HLA-A2 molecule and the Fc region of IgG1 (the dimer) introduced a single epitope into the co-culture. The dimer-coated monocytes stimulated the proliferation of autologous CD8(+) T cells after co-culturing. The CD8(+) T cell responses were self-HLA-restricted for HLA-A2-positive (HLA-A2+ve) samples and allo-HLA-restricted for HLA-A2-negative (HLA-A2-ve) samples, since the co-cultural bulks stained with HLA-A2 tetramers, human interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production in response to T cell receptor (TCR) ligands, and cytotoxicity against a panel of target cells exhibited peptide-specific properties. Two HLA-A2-restricted peptides with sequence homology were included, allowing the comparison of cross-reactivity between allo-antigen- and nominal antigen-induced CD8(+) T cell responses. Interestingly, the allo- and self-HLA-restricted CD8(+) T cell responses were similar in the peptide cross-reactivity, although the allorestricted T cell response seemed, overall, more intensive and had higher binding affinity to specific tetramer. Our findings indicated the alloreactive T cells raised by the co-culture in vitro were as peptide specific and cross-reactive as the self-HLA-restricted ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.