ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2013
Rapid identification and differentiation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from Vibrio spp. in seafood samples using developed monoclonal antibodies.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The pathogenesis, detection, and prevention of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific to Vibrio parahaemolyticus were successfully generated. According to the specificity of V. parahaemolyticus, MAbs can be classified into 5 groups. The MAbs VP-2D and VP-11H were specific to the O2 and O4 groups of V. parahaemolyticus, respectively. The MAb VP-11B reacted with 11 out of 30 isolates of V. parahaemolyticus used in this study. The MAb VP-516 bound to 27 out of 30 isolates of V. parahaemolyticus and cross reacted with all 10 isolates of V. alginolyticus. The MAb VP-618 demonstrated positive reactivity to 29 out of 30 isolates of V. parahaemolyticus and demonstrated slight cross reactivity to 3 out of 30 isolates of V. harveyi. The sensitivity of the MAbs ranged from 10(8) to 10(7) c.f.u. ml(-1) for V. parahaemolyticus obtained from pure cultures and depended on the group of MAbs. However, the detection capability could be improved to be equivalent to that of the PCR technique following pre-incubation of the samples in alkaline peptone water (APW). Using these MAbs along with MAbs specific to V. alginolyticus (VA-165), V. cholerae (VC-63), V. harveyi (VH-9B and VH-20C) and Vibrio spp. (VC-201) from previous studies, V. parahaemolyticus could be identified and differentiated from Vibrio spp. in various seafood samples including shrimp, green mussels, blood clams and oysters by a simple dot blot immunoassay without the requirement for bacterial isolation or biochemical characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23233121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.