Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23232994›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2013

Endosonography-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with a novel lumen-apposing stent.

Joan B Gornals, Carlos De la Serna-Higuera, Andrés Sánchez-Yague, Carme Loras, Andrés M Sánchez-Cantos, Manolo Pérez-Miranda

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02673541 (Randomized, Multi-Center, Comparative and Cost Effectiveness Study of a Lumen- Apposing, Covered, Self-Expanding Metal Stent), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02673541 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Randomized, Multi-Center, Comparative and Cost Effectiveness Study of a Lumen- Apposing, Covered, Self-Expanding Metal Stent (Axios™) Versus Multiple Double Pigtail Stents in the Management of Walled Off Pancreatic Necrosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2016 to 2017Enrolled5ConditionsPancreatic NecrosisArmsAXIOS™ stent, Double Pigtail Stents
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Advancements in the endoscopic treatment of pancreatic fluid collections.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  17. Alternative uses of lumen apposing metal stents.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joan B GornalsEndoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge - IDIBELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute), Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain. jgornals@bellvitgehospital.cat
Carlos De la Serna-Higuera
Andrés Sánchez-Yague
Carme Loras
Andrés M Sánchez-Cantos
Manolo Pérez-Miranda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study is to report our initial experience with a new fully covered metallic stent with a novel design (AXIOS) to prevent migration and fluid leakage, in the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC).

methodsWe included nine patients from four Spanish centers undergoing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of PFC with placement of an AXIOS stent. The lesions were accessed via transgastric (n = 7), transesophageal (n = 1), and transduodenal (n = 1) by using a novel access device (NAVIX) in six cases or a 19-G needle in three. Patients were individually followed prospectively for procedure indications, demographic data, previous imaging techniques, technical aspects, clinical outcomes, complications, and follow-up after endoscopic drainage.

resultsThe mean size of lesions was 105 ± 26.3 mm (range, 70-150). In six cases, cystoscopy was performed through the stent, including necrosectomy in two. Median procedure time was 25 ± 13 min. A median number of two sessions were performed. The technical success rate was 88.8 % (8/9) due to one failure of the delivery system. One patient developed a tension pneumothorax immediately after transesophageal drainage. No migrations were reported, and all stents were removed easily. All patients had a successful treatment outcome achieving complete cyst resolution. Mean time to stent retrieval was 33 ± 40 days. Mean follow-up was 50 ± 1.3 weeks (range, 45-55), and only one patient presented a recurrence 4 weeks after the stent removal. Furthermore, comparison with ten previous consecutively recruited PFC cases drained by EUS-guided using plastic pigtail stents was done. Technical and clinical successes were similar. However, two stent migrations, two recurrences, and two complications were found. The number of stents used (n = 15) and the median procedure time (42.8 ± 3.1 min) were significantly higher.

conclusionsDrainage of PFC using dedicated devices as this novel metallic stent with special design seems to be an effective, feasible and safe alternative technique.

Indexed as

EndosonographyPancreatic JuiceStentsAdultAgedDrainageFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic PseudocystProspective StudiesProsthesis Design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.