ArticleSurgical endoscopy2013
Endosonography-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with a novel lumen-apposing stent.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02673541 (Randomized, Multi-Center, Comparative and Cost Effectiveness Study of a Lumen- Apposing, Covered, Self-Expanding Metal Stent), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized, Multi-Center, Comparative and Cost Effectiveness Study of a Lumen- Apposing, Covered, Self-Expanding Metal Stent (Axios™) Versus Multiple Double Pigtail Stents in the Management of Walled Off Pancreatic Necrosis
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Are They Better Than Plastic Stents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2018Pooled it
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: are we getting evidence based--a systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Plastic pigtail vs lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis (PROMETHEUS study): an open-label, multicenter randomized trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Biomaterials in pancreatic surgery: progress and challenges in preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative care.Theranostics · 2026Review
- What We Know So Far About ECG for Pancreatic Pseudocysts.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Single Center Experience of Eus-Guided Cystogastrostomy and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) Positioning in Children with Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Case Series.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Indications, Techniques and Future Perspectives of Walled-off Necrosis Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Lumen Apposition: A Changing Landscape in Therapeutic Endoscopy.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
- Predictors of the need for necrosectomy in patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis treated with lumen apposition metal stents.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Is a coaxial plastic stent within a lumen-apposing metal stent useful for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction?Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- International, multicenter retrospective trial comparing the efficacy and safety of bi-flanged versus lumen-apposing metal stents for endoscopic drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis.Annals of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- A Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Surgical Creation of a Cystogastrostomy to Drain Pancreatic Pseudocysts and Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis in 5500 Patients.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2020Article
- Advancements in the endoscopic treatment of pancreatic fluid collections.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2020Review
- Alternative uses of lumen apposing metal stents.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Comparative Study Evaluating Lumen Apposing Metal Stents Versus Double Pigtail Plastic Stents for Treatment of Walled-Off Necrosis.Pancreas · 2020Article
- Endoscopic Transmural Necrosectomy: Timing, Indications, and Methods.Clinical endoscopy · 2020Review
- Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study is to report our initial experience with a new fully covered metallic stent with a novel design (AXIOS) to prevent migration and fluid leakage, in the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC).
methodsWe included nine patients from four Spanish centers undergoing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of PFC with placement of an AXIOS stent. The lesions were accessed via transgastric (n = 7), transesophageal (n = 1), and transduodenal (n = 1) by using a novel access device (NAVIX) in six cases or a 19-G needle in three. Patients were individually followed prospectively for procedure indications, demographic data, previous imaging techniques, technical aspects, clinical outcomes, complications, and follow-up after endoscopic drainage.
resultsThe mean size of lesions was 105 ± 26.3 mm (range, 70-150). In six cases, cystoscopy was performed through the stent, including necrosectomy in two. Median procedure time was 25 ± 13 min. A median number of two sessions were performed. The technical success rate was 88.8 % (8/9) due to one failure of the delivery system. One patient developed a tension pneumothorax immediately after transesophageal drainage. No migrations were reported, and all stents were removed easily. All patients had a successful treatment outcome achieving complete cyst resolution. Mean time to stent retrieval was 33 ± 40 days. Mean follow-up was 50 ± 1.3 weeks (range, 45-55), and only one patient presented a recurrence 4 weeks after the stent removal. Furthermore, comparison with ten previous consecutively recruited PFC cases drained by EUS-guided using plastic pigtail stents was done. Technical and clinical successes were similar. However, two stent migrations, two recurrences, and two complications were found. The number of stents used (n = 15) and the median procedure time (42.8 ± 3.1 min) were significantly higher.
conclusionsDrainage of PFC using dedicated devices as this novel metallic stent with special design seems to be an effective, feasible and safe alternative technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23232994What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.