Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23232808›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2013

A phase II trial of oral gimatecan for recurrent glioblastoma.

Jethro Hu, Patrick Y Wen, Lauren E Abrey, Camilo E Fadul, Jan Drappatz, Nadia Salem, Jeffrey G Supko, Fred Hochberg

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04571489 (Gimatecan), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04571489 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Gimatecan (ST1481) as Second-line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: an Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Phase II Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLee's Pharmaceutical LimitedRan2020 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsPancreatic CancerArmsGimatecan, tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil potassium, gemcitabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Trypanosomatids topoisomerase re-visited. New structural findings and role in drug discovery.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2014
    Review
  10. Recurrent malignant gliomas.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jethro HuJohnnie L. Cochran Jr. Brain Tumor Center, 8631 West Third St, Suite 410E, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA. jethro.hu@gmail.com
Patrick Y Wen
Lauren E Abrey
Camilo E Fadul
Jan Drappatz
Nadia Salem
Jeffrey G Supko
Fred Hochberg
Massachusetts General Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USSigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USThird Way · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gimatecan is a lipophilic oral camptothecin analogue with preclinical activity in glioma models. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of gimatecan in adults with recurrent glioblastoma. Eligibility criteria included ≤1 prior treatment for recurrent disease, age ≥18, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and normal organ function. Patients taking enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medications were excluded. Gimatecan 1.22 mg/m(2) was given orally once daily for 5 consecutive days during each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months. A Simon 2-stage optimal design was used in which 19 patients were evaluated in the 1st stage, with an additional 36 patients accrued if >4 patients in stage 1 achieved PFS at 6 months. 29 patients were enrolled in the study, with median age of 58 years (range, 25-77 years); 58.6 % female. All patients received prior surgery, radiation therapy, and at least one chemotherapy regimen. The daily dose was reduced to 1.0 mg/m(2) after four of the first 10 patients experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity. Treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (17.2 %), leukopenia (17.2 %) and neutropenia (10.3 %). None of the 19 patients treated at 1.0 mg/m(2)/day experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity. One patient had a partial radiographic response by modified Macdonald criteria. Only 3 patients (12 %) were progression-free at 6 months. Median time to progression was 12.0 weeks (7.0, 17.0).Treatment with gimatecan 1.0 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days, repeated every 28-days showed minimal efficacy.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBrain NeoplasmsCamptothecinDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGlioblastomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinST 1481

Identifiers

PMID23232808
OpenAlexW1978910085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.