Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23232666›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2013

Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention: is warfarin still an option? Yes: Debate at the Controversies in Neurology Congress, Beijing, October 2011.

J David Spence

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cardioembolic stroke: everything has changed.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2018
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J David SpenceStroke Prevention and Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, 1400 Western Road, London, ON, N6G 2V2, Canada, dspence@robarts.ca.
Western University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of new oral anticoagulants, the place of warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation needs re-evaluation. Warfarin is difficult to use, because of large individual differences in response and metabolism, many significant interactions with drugs and foods, and fluctuations in vitamin K absorption. It requires frequent blood testing and dose adjustments, so with good reason patients and physicians are eager for the newer agents that are easier to use. However, the purchase price of the new anticoagulants is so high that warfarin will remain in widespread use. It is important therefore for physicians to know how to use it well. Anticoagulants work much better for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation than do antiplatelet agents; physicians need to understand the concept of red thrombus (for which anticoagulants are required) versus white thrombus-platelet aggregates-which are the target of antiplatelet agents. Stroke from atrial fibrillation increases steeply with age, and the elderly benefit disproportionately from anticoagulation. It is still necessary for physicians to know how to use warfarin, and to use it better than it has been used in the past.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationHumansStrokeWarfarinAnticoagulantsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID23232666
OpenAlexW2097881674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.