Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23232583›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2013

Improving adherence to a care plan generated from the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool.

C Cooper, E R Brierley, S T Burden

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C CooperDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Central Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
E R Brierley
S T Burden

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesRecommendations state that all hospital patients should be screened for malnutrition and for each level of risk, a suitable care plan should be available. This study investigates current practice at ward level regarding adherence to a care plan generated from a nutrition screening tool, and then aims to improve basic nutritional support actions by modifying a care plan and finally evaluates change in practice. SUBJECTS/

methodsPro formas were completed on nutrition care plans of 100 patients. Subsequently, 7 focus groups were conducted, which included 30 ward staff and 6 dietitians. Care plans were re-designed using information from focus groups, followed by a second set of pro formas on the care plans of 103 patients.

resultsThemes regarding barriers and facilitators for completion of care plans were derived from the focus groups including: 'duplication', 'time pressures', 'leadership support', 'operational issues', 'document style' and 'training'. Pro formas before and after re-design showed that nutritional support actions increased from 13 (9%) to 98 (52%) for patients at moderate or severe risk of malnutrition (P=0.033).

conclusionsFocus groups allowed engagement with ward staff to explore how care plans were used, which assisted in re-designing the care plan, while the pro formas identified limitations of initial procedures and then evaluated change. Subsequently, basic nutritional support actions that resulted from screening improved. The suitability of care plans to facilitate basic nutritional support and documentation was enhanced. However, improvements are still required, emphasising the necessity for continued training and a strategic approach to the delivery of basic nutritional care.

Indexed as

HospitalizationNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentQuality ImprovementFocus GroupsHospitalsHumansMalnutritionNutritional SupportRisk

Identifiers

PMID23232583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.