Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23232287›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2013

Quality of life before intensive care using EQ-5D: patient versus proxy responses.

Victor D Dinglas, Jeneen M Gifford, Nadia Husain, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Dale M Needham

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor D DinglasOutcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jeneen M Gifford
Nadia Husain
Elizabeth Colantuoni
Dale M Needham
Health Protection and Research Organisation · AFJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

VENTILATOR ASSOCIATED LUNG INJURY: MOLECULAR APPROACHESP50HL073994 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DIETTE, GREGORY B · 2003 to 2007
$21.3M
Five Year Outcomes from Acute Lung InjuryK24HL088551 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRONOVOST, PETER J. · 2009 to 2013
$975k
CIHRNHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL088551NHLBI NIH HHS P050 HL 73994NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL073994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare patients' retrospectively reported baseline quality of life before intensive care hospitalization with population norms and proxy reports.

designProspective cohort study.

settingThirteen ICUs at four teaching hospitals in Baltimore, MD. PATIENTS: One hundred forty acute lung injury survivors and their designated proxies.

interventionsAround the time of hospital discharge, both patients and proxies were asked to retrospectively estimate patients' baseline quality of life before hospital admission using the EQ-5D quality-of-life instrument. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsMean patient-rated EQ-5D visual analog scale scores and utility scores were significantly lower than population norms but were significantly higher than proxy ratings. However, the magnitude of difference in average utility scores between patients and either population norms or proxies was not clinically important. For the five individual EQ-5D domains, κ statistics revealed slight to fair agreement between patients and proxies. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that for both the visual analog scale and utility scores, proxies underestimated scores when patients reported high ratings and overestimated scores for low patient ratings.

conclusionsPatients retrospectively reported worse baseline health status before acute lung injury than population norms and better status than proxy reports; however, the magnitude of these differences in health status may not be clinically important. Proxies had only slight to fair agreement with patients in all five EQ-5D domains, attenuating patients' more extreme ratings toward moderate scores. Caution is required when interpreting proxy retrospective reports of baseline health status for survivors of acute lung injury.

Indexed as

ProxyQuality of LifeSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesAcute Lung InjuryAdultBaltimoreCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMatched-Pair AnalysisMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReference Values

Identifiers

PMID23232287
PMCPMC3531666
OpenAlexW1996746689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.