Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23231789›Full record

ArticleCough (London, England)2012

Data reduction for cough studies using distribution of audio frequency content.

Antony Barton, Patrick Gaydecki, Kimberley Holt, Jaclyn A Smith

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cough (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05042063 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Acoustic Cough Monitoring for the Management of Patients With Known Respiratory Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorClinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de NavarraRan2021 to 2022Enrolled616ConditionsCough, COPD, GERD, AsthmaArmsHyfe Cough Tracker, Hyfe Air
NCT05723159 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Validation of the Hyfe Cough Monitoring System

TypeobservationalSponsorHyfe IncRan2023 to 2023Enrolled21ConditionsCoughArmsClinical Validation of the Hyfe Cough Monitoring System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Validation of a small cough detector.ERJ open research · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The present and future of cough counting tools.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020
    Review
  12. Methods for assessing cough sensitivity.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Antitussive drugs--past, present, and future.Pharmacological reviews · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antony BartonRespiratory Research Group, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, University Hospital of South Manchester, ERC Building, Second floor, Manchester, M23 9LT, United Kingdom. jacky.smith@manchester.ac.uk.
Patrick Gaydecki
Kimberley Holt
Jaclyn A Smith

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled

backgroundRecent studies suggest that objectively quantifying coughing in audio recordings offers a novel means to understand coughing and assess treatments. Currently, manual cough counting is the most accurate method for quantifying coughing. However, the demand of manually counting cough records is substantial, demonstrating a need to reduce record lengths prior to counting whilst preserving the coughs within them. This study tested the performance of an algorithm developed for this purpose.

methods20 subjects were recruited (5 healthy smokers and non-smokers, 5 chronic cough, 5 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 5 asthma), fitted with an ambulatory recording system and recorded for 24 hours. The recordings produced were divided into 15 min segments and counted. Periods of inactive audio in each segment were removed using the median frequency and power of the audio signal and the resulting files re-counted.

resultsThe median resultant segment length was 13.9 s (IQR 56.4 s) and median 24 hr recording length 62.4 min (IQR 100.4). A median of 0.0 coughs/h (IQR 0.0-0.2) were erroneously removed and the variability in the resultant cough counts was comparable to that between manual cough counts. The largest error was seen in asthmatic patients, but still only 1.0% coughs/h were missed.

conclusionsThese data show that a system which measures signal activity using the median audio frequency can substantially reduce record lengths without significantly compromising the coughs contained within them.

Identifiers

PMID23231789
PMCPMC3546839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.