ArticleDrugs2012
Adalimumab: in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.
Article in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of adalimumab in treating axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Neurological Side Effects of TNF-α Inhibitors Revisited: A Review of Case Reports.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Monoclonal Antibodies: What the Diagnostic Neuroradiologist Needs to Know.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Review
- Preparation and characterization of a fully human monoclonal antibody specific for human tumor necrosis factor alpha.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- A case report about adalimumab-induced radiologically isolated syndrome: A significant side effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.SAGE open medical case reports · 2021Article
- Drug repurposing to improve treatment of rheumatic autoimmune inflammatory diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2020Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adalimumab is a fully human, recombinant, monoclonal IgG1 antibody specific for the cytokine tumour necrosis factor-α. It is approved for the treatment of various inflammatory disorders, including severe non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The clinical efficacy of adalimumab (40 mg administered subcutaneously every other week) in adult patients meeting the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria for axSpA but not the modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been demonstrated in the pivotal phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ABILITY-1 trial (n = 192 randomized). In ABILITY-1, adalimumab was effective in improving the signs and symptoms of non-radiographic axSpA in patients who had active disease despite treatment with NSAIDs or who were intolerant to, or had a contraindication for, NSAIDs. Compared with placebo, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving adalimumab 40 mg every other week achieved an ASAS 40 response after 12 weeks of treatment (primary endpoint). Furthermore, adalimumab significantly decreased inflammation in the spine and sacroiliac joints, as measured by MRI, and improved spondyloarthritic and general measures of health-related quality of life at 12 weeks. Efficacy of adalimumab was sustained over the longer term, according to data at 68 weeks from an open-label extension of ABILITY-1. Adalimumab was generally well tolerated in clinical trials of non-radiographic axSpA; the adverse event profile was similar to that in patients with AS or other approved indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.