Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23231024›Full record

ArticleDrugs2012

Adalimumab: in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

Celeste B Burness, Emma D Deeks

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Celeste B BurnessAdis, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@springer.com
Emma D Deeks

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adalimumab is a fully human, recombinant, monoclonal IgG1 antibody specific for the cytokine tumour necrosis factor-α. It is approved for the treatment of various inflammatory disorders, including severe non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The clinical efficacy of adalimumab (40 mg administered subcutaneously every other week) in adult patients meeting the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria for axSpA but not the modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been demonstrated in the pivotal phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ABILITY-1 trial (n = 192 randomized). In ABILITY-1, adalimumab was effective in improving the signs and symptoms of non-radiographic axSpA in patients who had active disease despite treatment with NSAIDs or who were intolerant to, or had a contraindication for, NSAIDs. Compared with placebo, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving adalimumab 40 mg every other week achieved an ASAS 40 response after 12 weeks of treatment (primary endpoint). Furthermore, adalimumab significantly decreased inflammation in the spine and sacroiliac joints, as measured by MRI, and improved spondyloarthritic and general measures of health-related quality of life at 12 weeks. Efficacy of adalimumab was sustained over the longer term, according to data at 68 weeks from an open-label extension of ABILITY-1. Adalimumab was generally well tolerated in clinical trials of non-radiographic axSpA; the adverse event profile was similar to that in patients with AS or other approved indications.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsHumansRadiographyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexSpondylarthritisTreatment OutcomeAdalimumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23231024
OpenAlexW2315997774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.