Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23230826›Full record

ArticleClinical endocrinology2013

Functional characterization of nonmetastatic paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma by (18) F-FDOPA PET: focus on missed lesions.

Sophie Gabriel, Elise M Blanchet, Frédéric Sebag, Clara C Chen, Nicolas Fakhry, Arnaud Deveze, Anne Barlier, Isabelle Morange, Karel Pacak, David Taïeb

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical endocrinology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Comparison ofRadiology. Imaging cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Head-to-head comparison between [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Hybrid imaging of neuroendocrine tumors in the heart: Union is strength.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Imaging of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diagnostic Investigation of Lesions Associated with Succinate Dehydrogenase Defects.Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. (18)F-DOPA: the versatile radiopharmaceutical.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016
    Article
  18. 18F-FLT PET/CT in the Evaluation of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: A Pilot Study.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sophie GabrielDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, CERIMED, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Elise M Blanchet
Frédéric Sebag
Clara C Chen
Nicolas Fakhry
Arnaud Deveze
Anne Barlier
Isabelle Morange
Karel Pacak
David Taïeb

Funding

Diagnosis, Pathophysiology And Molecular Biology of Pheochromocytoma and ParagangliomaZIAHD008735 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI PACAK, KAREL · 2009 to 2024
$28.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD008735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

methodsTo evaluate the clinical value of (18) F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine ((18) F-FDOPA) PET in relation to tumour localization and the patient's genetic status in a large series of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PHEO/PGL) patients and to discuss in detail false-negative results. A retrospective study of PGL patients who were investigated with (18) F-FDOPA PET or PET/CT imaging in two academic endocrine tumour centres was conducted (La Timone University Hospital, Marseilles, France and National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA).

resultsOne hundred sixteen patients (39·7% harbouring germline mutations in known disease susceptibility genes) were evaluated for a total of 195 PHEO/PGL foci. (18) F-FDOPA PET correctly detected 179 lesions (91·8%) in 107 patients (92·2%). Lesion-based sensitivities for parasympathetic PGLs (head, neck, or anterior/middle thoracic ones), PHEOs, and extra-adrenal sympathetic (abdominal or posterior thoracic) PGLs were 98·2% [96·5% for Timone and 100% for NIH], 93·9% [93·8 and 93·9%] and 70·3% [47·1 and 90%] respectively (P < 0·001). Sympathetic (adrenal and extra-adrenal) SDHx-related PGLs were at a higher risk for negative (18) F-FDOPA PET than non-SDHx-related PGLs (14/24 vs 0/62, respectively, P < 0·001). In contrast, the risk of negative (18) F-FDOPA PET was lower for parasympathetic PGLs regardless of the genetic background (1/90 in SDHx vs 1/19 in non-SDHx tumours, P = 0·32). (18) F-FDOPA PET failed to detect two head and neck PGLs (HNPGL), likely due to their small size, whereas most missed sympathetic PGL were larger and may have exhibited a specific (18) F-FDOPA-negative imaging phenotype. (18) F-FDG PET detected all the missed sympathetic lesions.

conclusions(18) F-FDOPA PET appears to be a very sensitive functional imaging tool for HNPGL regardless of the genetic status of the tumours. Patients with false-negative tumours on (18) F-FDOPA PET should be tested for SDHx mutations.

Indexed as

Abdominal NeoplasmsAdrenal Gland NeoplasmsDihydroxyphenylalanineFalse Negative ReactionsHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansParagangliomaPheochromocytomaPositron-Emission TomographyRetrospective StudiesSuccinate DehydrogenaseDihydroxyphenylalaninefluorodopa F 18Succinate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID23230826
PMCPMC3610811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.