Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23230061›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2013

Age- and sex-specific mortality associated with the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic in Kentucky.

Cécile Viboud, Jana Eisenstein, Ann H Reid, Thomas A Janczewski, David M Morens, Jeffery K Taubenberger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Body Size and Risk of Death During the 1918 Influenza Pandemic in Alaska.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  3. The 1919-21 influenza pandemic in Greenland.International journal of circumpolar health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Clinical data to be used as a foundation to combat Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy.Journal of interprofessional education & practice · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Covid-19 in Historical Context: Creating a Practical Past.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Influenza in High-Risk Hosts-Lessons Learned from Animal Models.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cécile ViboudFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jana Eisenstein
Ann H Reid
Thomas A Janczewski
David M Morens
Jeffery K Taubenberger
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology · USFogarty International Center · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Analysis of Historical Influenza VirusesZIAAI000995 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI TAUBENBERGER, JEFFERY · 2009 to 2017
$4.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reasons for the unusual age-specific mortality patterns of the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic remain unknown. Here we characterize pandemic-related mortality by single year of age in a unique statewide Kentucky data set and explore breakpoints in the age curves.

methodsIndividual death certificates from Kentucky during 1911-1919 were abstracted by medically trained personnel. Pandemic-associated excess mortality rates were calculated by subtracting observed rates during pandemic months from rates in previous years, separately for each single year of age and by sex.

resultsThe age profile of excess mortality risk in fall 1918 was characterized by a maximum among infants, a minimum at ages 9-10 years, a maximum at ages 24-26 years, and a second minimum at ages 56-59 years. The excess mortality risk in young adults had been greatly attenuated by winter 1919. The age breakpoints of mortality risk did not differ between males and females.

conclusionsThe observed mortality breakpoints in male and female cohorts born during 1859-1862, 1892-1894, and 1908-1909 did not coincide with known dates of historical pandemics. The atypical age mortality patterns of the 1918-1919 pandemic cannot be explained by military crowding, war-related factors, or prior immunity alone and likely result from a combination of unknown factors.

Indexed as

PandemicsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza, HumanKentuckyMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID23230061
PMCPMC3563305
OpenAlexW2162112824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.