Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2013
Breast cancer treatment decision-making: are we asking too much of patients?
Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03350854 (An Intervention to Improve Decision Role Concordance Amongst Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Intervention to Improve Decision Role Concordance Amongst Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Health Literacy Among Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.World journal of surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Regret in Surgical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Patient and Physician Perspectives.World journal of surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Does a decision aid for prostate cancer affect different aspects of decisional regret, assessed with new regret scales? A randomized, controlled trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016Trial
- Decision regret in patients with rectal cancer undergoing multimodal therapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Defer, Share, or Drive the Decision: Empowering Patients With Varied Preferences to Engage in Decision-making (an Analysis From Alliance A231701CD).Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- Biomarker recall and understanding among people living with metastatic breast cancer - results from an international patient survey.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Regret concerning treatment decisions in patients with primary or secondary brain tumors - a cross-sectional exploratory bicentric analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Trends in postmastectomy radiotherapy for early and locally advanced breast cancer in Switzerland: a population-based cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Decision Regret About Treatment Amongst Women With Early Breast Cancer: An Integrative Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Review
- Culturally appropriate patient-provider communication methods for Black women with breast cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Breast density knowledge and willingness to delay treatment for pre-operative breast cancer imaging among women with a personal history of breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Decision regret of cancer patients after radiotherapy: results from a cross-sectional observational study at a large tertiary cancer center in Germany.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Observational
- Patient Interest in Exploring Nonsurgical Treatment Approaches for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2024Article
- Shared decision-making and the lessons learned about decision regret in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Observational
- Health Literacy, Language, and Cancer-Related Needs in the First 6 Months After a Breast Cancer Diagnosis.JCO oncology practice · 2020Article
- Personal factors influencing breast cancer patients' perception of breast conservation surgery in West China.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Local Therapy Decisional Regret in Older Women With Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2019Article
- The association of socioeconomic status with receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the Quality of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Delivery for Breast Cancer Care in the United States.JAMA oncology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePhysicians are mandated to offer treatment choices to patients, yet not all patients may want the responsibility that entails. We evaluated predisposing factors for, and long-term consequences of, too much and not enough perceived decision-making responsibility among breast cancer patients.
designLongitudinal assessment, with measurements collected just after surgical treatment (baseline) and 6-month follow-up.
participantsWomen with early-stage breast cancer treated surgically at eight NYC hospitals, recruited for a randomized controlled trial of patient assistance to improve receipt of adjuvant treatment. MEASUREMENTS: Using logistic regression, we explored multivariable-adjusted associations between perceived treatment decision-making responsibility and a) baseline knowledge of treatment benefit and b) 6-month decision regret.
resultsOf 368 women aged 28-89 years, 72 % reported a "reasonable amount", 21 % "too much", and 7 % "not enough" responsibility for treatment decision-making at baseline. Health literacy problems were most common among those with "not enough" (68 %) and "too much" responsibility (62 %). Only 29 % of women had knowledge of treatment benefits; 40 % experienced 6-month decision regret. In multivariable analysis, women reporting "too much" vs. "reasonable amount" of responsibility had less treatment knowledge ([OR] = 0.44, [95 % CI] = 0.20-0.99; model c = 0.7343;p < 0.01) and more decision regret ([OR] = 2.,91 [95 % CI] = 1.40-6.06; model c = 0.7937;p < 0.001). Findings were similar for women reporting "not enough" responsibility, though not statistically significant.
conclusionToo much perceived responsibility for breast cancer treatment decisions was associated with poor baseline treatment knowledge and 6-month decision regret. Health literacy problems were common, suggesting that health care professionals find alternative ways to communicate with low health literacy patients, enabling them to assume the desired amount of decision-making responsibility, thereby reducing decision regret.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.