Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23229748›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences2012

Molecular genetics, physiology and biology of self-incompatibility in Brassicaceae.

Masao Watanabe, Keita Suwabe, Go Suzuki

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Double-Locking Mechanism of Self-Compatibility inFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masao WatanabeLaboratory of Plant Reproductive Genetics, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan. nabe@ige.tohoku.ac.jp
Keita Suwabe
Go Suzuki
Mie University · JPOsaka Kyoiku University · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-incompatibility (SI) is defined as the inability to produce zygotes after self-pollination in a fertile hermaphrodite plant, which has stamens and pistils in the same flower. This structural organization of the hermaphrodite flower increases the risk of self-pollination, leading to low genetic diversity. To avoid this problem plants have established several pollination systems, among which the most elegant system is surely SI. The SI trait can be observed in Brassica crops, including cabbage, broccoli, turnip and radish. To produce hybrid seed of these crops efficiently, the SI trait has been employed in an agricultural context. From another point of view, the recognition reaction of SI during pollen-stigma interaction is an excellent model system for cell-cell communication and signal transduction in higher plants. In this review, we describe the molecular mechanisms of SI in Brassicaceae, which have been dissected by genetic, physiological, and biological approaches, and we discuss the future prospects in relation to associated scientific fields and new technologies.

Indexed as

Molecular BiologyAllelesBrassicaceaeGenetic LociPlant ProteinsSelf-Incompatibility in Flowering PlantsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23229748
PMCPMC3552045
OpenAlexW1976705108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.