Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23229734›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2013

Birth cohort effects on abdominal obesity in the United States: the Silent Generation, Baby Boomers and Generation X.

W R Robinson, R L Utz, K M Keyes, C L Martin, Y Yang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Memories of nursing in Singapore - an oral history approach.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2023
    Article
  9. Cohort Trends in the Burden of Multiple Chronic Conditions Among Aging U.S. Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

W R RobinsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. whitney_robinson@unc.edu
R L Utz
K M Keyes
C L Martin
Y Yang
Columbia University · USDepartment of Health · ZAUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
Training Program in Reproductive, Perinatal, and Pediatric EpidemiologyT32HD052468 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Julie L Daniels · 2008 to 2026
$3.8M
Racial disparities in cancer outcomes: quantifying modifiable mechanismsK01CA172717 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBINSON, WHITNEY RAGAN · 2012 to 2016
$639k
Sex Differences in Health and Longevity: A Social and Biodemographic ApproachK01AG036745 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI YANG, YANG CLAIRE · 2010 to 2014
$602k
NCI NIH HHS 1K01CA172717-01NCI NIH HHS K01 CA172717NCI NIH HHS NCI P01-CA13837NIA NIH HHS 1K01AG036745-01NIA NIH HHS K01 AG036745NICHD NIH HHS 5T32 HD052468-04NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD052468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbdominal obesity predicts a wide range of adverse health outcomes. Over the past several decades, prevalence of abdominal obesity has increased markedly in industrialized countries like the United States No previous analyses, however, have evaluated whether there are birth cohort effects for abdominal obesity. Estimating cohort effects is necessary to forecast future health trends and understand the past population-level trends.

methodsThis analysis evaluated whether there were birth cohort effects for abdominal obesity for the Silent Generation (born 1925-1945), children of the Great Depression; Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964); or Generation X (born 1965-1980). Cohort effects for prevalence of abdominal obesity were estimated using the median polish method with data collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1988 and 2008. Respondents were aged 20-74 years.

resultsAfter taking into account age effects and ubiquitous secular changes, the Silent Generation and Generation X had higher cohort-specific prevalence of abdominal obesity than the Baby Boomers. Effects were more pronounced in women than men.

conclusionsThis work presents a novel finding: evidence that the birth cohorts of the post-World War II Baby Boom appeared to have uniquely low cohort effects on abdominal obesity. The growing prosperity of the post-World War II US may have exposed the baby-boom generation to lower levels of psychosocial and socioeconomic stress than the previous or subsequent generations. By identifying factors associated with the Baby Boomers' low cohort-specific sensitivity to the obesogenic environment, the obesity prevention community can identify early-life factors that can protect future generations from excess weight gain.

Indexed as

Nutrition SurveysPopulation GrowthAdultAgedAge DistributionBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesCohort EffectDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, AbdominalPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23229734
PMCPMC3604045
OpenAlexW1981370161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.