Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23228330›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2013

Impact of mutations on the allosteric conformational equilibrium.

Patrick Weinkam, Yao Chi Chen, Jaume Pons, Andrej Sali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genes · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Machine learning and protein allostery.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Allosteric Dynamic Control of Binding.Biophysical journal · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick WeinkamDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. pweinkam@salilab.org
Yao Chi Chen
Jaume Pons
Andrej Sali
University of California, San Francisco · USInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica · TWPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

Theoretical and Computational ApproachesP01GM071790 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI RAUSHEL, FRANK M. · 2004 to 2013
$15.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM071790NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM71790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allostery in a protein involves effector binding at an allosteric site that changes the structure and/or dynamics at a distant, functional site. In addition to the chemical equilibrium of ligand binding, allostery involves a conformational equilibrium between one protein substate that binds the effector and a second substate that less strongly binds the effector. We run molecular dynamics simulations using simple, smooth energy landscapes to sample specific ligand-induced conformational transitions, as defined by the effector-bound and effector-unbound protein structures. These simulations can be performed using our web server (http://salilab.org/allosmod/). We then develop a set of features to analyze the simulations and capture the relevant thermodynamic properties of the allosteric conformational equilibrium. These features are based on molecular mechanics energy functions, stereochemical effects, and structural/dynamic coupling between sites. Using a machine-learning algorithm on a data set of 10 proteins and 179 mutations, we predict both the magnitude and the sign of the allosteric conformational equilibrium shift by the mutation; the impact of a large identifiable fraction of the mutations can be predicted with an average unsigned error of 1k(B)T. With similar accuracy, we predict the mutation effects for an 11th protein that was omitted from the initial training and testing of the machine-learning algorithm. We also assess which calculated thermodynamic properties contribute most to the accuracy of the prediction.

Indexed as

MutationAlgorithmsAllosteric RegulationArtificial IntelligenceLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID23228330
PMCPMC3557769
OpenAlexW2014038272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.