ArticleACS chemical biology2013
Epitope-guided engineering of monobody binders for in vivo inhibition of Erk-2 signaling.
Article in ACS chemical biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural and Energetic Determinants of Monobody Recognition of Oncogenic KRAS Variants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Study of spatiotemporal regulation of kinase signaling using genetically encodable molecular tools.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2022Review
- Targeting Phosphotyrosine in Native Proteins with Conditional, Bispecific Antibody Traps.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2020Article
- Signaling diversity enabled by Rap1-regulated plasma membrane ERK with distinct temporal dynamics.eLife · 2020Article
- Advances in targeted degradation of endogenous proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019Review
- Engineering a Protein Binder Specific for p38α with Interface Expansion.Biochemistry · 2018Article
- Beyond antibody engineering: directed evolution of alternative binding scaffolds and enzymes using yeast surface display.Microbial cell factories · 2018Review
- Beyond Antibodies as Binding Partners: The Role of Antibody Mimetics in Bioanalysis.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although the affinity optimization of protein binders is straightforward, engineering epitope specificity is more challenging. Targeting a specific surface patch is important because the biological relevance of protein binders depends on how they interact with the target. They are particularly useful to test hypotheses motivated by biochemical and structural studies. We used yeast display to engineer monobodies that bind a defined surface patch on the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) Erk-2. The targeted area ("CD" domain) is known to control the specificity and catalytic efficiency of phosphorylation by the kinase by binding a linear peptide ("D" peptide) on substrates and regulators. An inhibitor of the interaction should thus be useful for regulating Erk-2 signaling in vivo. Although the CD domain constitutes only a small percentage of the surface area of the enzyme (~5%), sorting a yeast displayed monobody library with wild type (wt) Erk-2 and a rationally designed mutant led to isolation of high affinity clones with desired epitope specificity. The engineered binders inhibited the activity of Erk-2 in vitro and in mammalian cells. Furthermore, they specifically inhibited the activity of Erk-2 orthologs in yeast and suppressed a mutant phenotype in round worms caused by overactive MAPK signaling. The study therefore shows that positive and negative screening can be used to bias the evolution of epitope specificity and predictably design inhibitors of biologically relevant protein-protein interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.