Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23227489›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2012

What paths do advantageous alleles take during short-term evolutionary change?

Molly K Burke, Anthony D Long

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolution of stickleback in 50 years on earthquake-uplifted islands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A guide for the design of evolve and resequencing studies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Molly K BurkeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2525, USA.
Anthony D Long

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 19467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining experimental evolution with whole-genome resequencing is a promising new strategy for investigating the dynamics of evolutionary change. Published studies that have resequenced laboratory-selected populations of sexual organisms have typically focused on populations sampled at the end of an evolution experiment. These studies have attempted to associate particular alleles with phenotypic change and attempted to distinguish between different theoretical models of adaptation. However, neither the population used to initiate the experiment nor multiple time points sampled during the evolutionary trajectory are generally available for examination. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Orozco-terWengel et al. (2012) take a significant step forward by estimating genome-wide allele frequencies at the start, 15 generations into and at the end of a 37-generation Drosophila experimental evolution study. The authors identify regions of the genome that have responded to laboratory selection and describe the temporal dynamics of allele frequency change. They identify two common trajectories for putatively adaptive alleles: alleles either gradually increase in frequency throughout the entire 37 generations or alleles plateau at a new frequency by generation 15. The identification of complex trajectories of alleles under selection contributes to a growing body of literature suggesting that simple models of adaptation, whereby beneficial alleles arise and increase in frequency unimpeded until they become fixed, may not adequately describe short-term response to selection.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.