Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23227307›Full record

ArticleJournal of transplantation2012

Renal Function and NODM in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients Treated with Standard and Reduced Levels of Tacrolimus in Combination with EC-MPS.

Laurence Chan, Amado Andres, Suphamai Bunnapradist, Kristene Gugliuzza, Ravi Parasuraman, V Ram Peddi, Elisabeth Cassuto, Marquis Hart

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00229138 (A Six-month, Prospective, Multicenter, Open Label, Parallel, Randomized Study of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of EC-MPS With Basiliximab, Corticosteroids and Two Different Levels of Tacrolimus in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00229138 phase4completednot on this map

A Six-month, Prospective, Multicenter, Open Label, Parallel, Randomized Study of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of EC-MPS With Basiliximab, Corticosteroids and Two Different Levels of Tacrolimus in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2005 to 2007Enrolled291ConditionsKidney TransplantationArmsEC-MPS, Tacrolimus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Metabolic consequences of modern immunosuppressive agents in solid organ transplantation.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2016
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laurence ChanTransplant Center, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Amado Andres
Suphamai Bunnapradist
Kristene Gugliuzza
Ravi Parasuraman
V Ram Peddi
Elisabeth Cassuto
Marquis Hart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information is lacking concerning concomitant administration of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium with tacrolimus (EC-MPS+Tac) in renal transplant recipients (RTxR). In this 6-month, prospective, open-label, multicenter study, de novo RTxR were randomized (1 : 1) to low-dose (LD) or standard-dose (SD) Tac with basiliximab, EC-MPS 720 mg bid, and steroids. Primary objective was to compare renal function at 6-month posttransplantation. Secondary objectives were to compare the incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss and death, and new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM). 292 patients (LD n = 151, SD n = 141) were included. Mean Tac levels were at the low end of the target range in standard-exposure patients (SD, n = 141) and exceeded target range in low-exposure patients (LD = 151) throughout the study. There was no significant difference in mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between treatments (ITT-population: 63.6 versus 61.0 mL/min). Incidence of BPAR was similar (10.6% versus 9.9%). NODM was significantly less frequent in LD Tac (17% versus 31%; P = 0.02); other adverse effects (AEs) were comparable. EC-MPS+Tac (LD/SD) was efficacious and well tolerated with well-preserved renal function. No renal function benefits were demonstrated, possibly related to poor adherence to reduced Tac exposure.

Identifiers

PMID23227307
PMCPMC3512323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.