Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23227221›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Identification of regions involved in substrate binding and dimer stabilization within the central domains of yeast Hsp40 Sis1.

Júlio C Borges, Thiago V Seraphim, David Z Mokry, Fabio C L Almeida, Douglas M Cyr, Carlos H I Ramos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. SMR peptide antagonizesMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MsDjB4, a HSP40 Chaperone in Alfalfa (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Differential Interactions of Molecular Chaperones and Yeast Prions.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Class-specific interactions between Sis1 J-domain protein and Hsp70 chaperone potentiate disaggregation of misfolded proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Júlio C BorgesInstitute of Chemistry of São Carlos, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thiago V Seraphim
David Z Mokry
Fabio C L Almeida
Douglas M Cyr
Carlos H I Ramos
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRNational Institute of Science and Technology for Structural Biology and Bioimaging · BRUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Roles for Hsp70 and Hsp40 in Membrane Protein TriageR01GM056981 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CYR, DOUGLAS M · 1998 to 2019
$6.1M
Hsp40 and Stress ProtectionR01GM067785 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CYR, DOUGLAS M · 2003 to 2011
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056981NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein folding, refolding and degradation are essential for cellular life and are regulated by protein homeostatic processes such those that involve the molecular chaperone DnaK/Hsp70 and its co-chaperone DnaJ. Hsp70 action is initiated when proteins from the DnaJ family bind an unfolded protein for delivery purposes. In eukaryotes, the DnaJ family can be divided into two main groups, Type I and Type II, represented by yeast cytosolic Ydj1 and Sis1, respectively. Although sharing some unique features both members of the DnaJ family, Ydj1 and Sis1 are structurally and functionally distinct as deemed by previous studies, including the observation that their central domains carry the structural and functional information even in switched chimeras. In this study, we combined several biophysical tools for evaluating the stability of Sis1 and mutants that had the central domains (named Gly/Met rich domain and C-terminal Domain I) deleted or switched to those of Ydj1 to gain insight into the role of these regions in the structure and function of Sis1. The mutants retained some functions similar to full length wild-type Sis1, however they were defective in others. We found that: 1) Sis1 unfolds in at least two steps as follows: folded dimer to partially folded monomer and then to an unfolded monomer. 2) The Gly/Met rich domain had intrinsically disordered characteristics and its deletion had no effect on the conformational stability of the protein. 3) The deletion of the C-terminal Domain I perturbed the stability of the dimer. 4) Exchanging the central domains perturbed the conformational stability of the protein. Altogether, our results suggest the existence of two similar subdomains in the C-terminal domain of DnaJ that could be important for stabilizing each other in order to maintain a folded substrate-binding site as well as the dimeric state of the protein.

Indexed as

Protein MultimerizationAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesCalorimetry, Differential ScanningCircular DichroismHSP40 Heat-Shock ProteinsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutant ProteinsProtein StabilityProtein Structure, TertiaryProtein UnfoldingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSpectrometry, FluorescenceHSP40 Heat-Shock ProteinsMutant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSIS1 protein, S cerevisiaeUreaYDJ1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID23227221
PMCPMC3515540
OpenAlexW1991527687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.