Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23226949›Full record

ReviewDialogues in clinical neuroscience2012

Classification of autism and related conditions: progress, challenges, and opportunities.

Fred R Volkmar, Brian Reichow, James McPartland

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Brief Report: The Negev Hospital-University-Based (HUB) Autism Database.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Ecuador: A Pilot Study in Quito.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fred R VolkmarChild Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 207900 (230 South Frontage Rd), New Haven, CT 06520-7900, USA. fred.volkmar@yale.edu
Brian Reichow
James McPartland

Funding

Developmental Social Neuroscience in Infants At-Risk for AutismK23MH086785 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MCPARTLAND, JAMES CHARLES · 2010 to 2013
$725k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH086785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since Kanner's classic description of the syndrome of early infantile autism in 1943, conceptions of the disorder have evolved while retaining important continuity with what Kanner viewed as the hallmarks of the condition-social impairment (autism) and difficulties in dealing with change in the nonsocial world (insistence on sameness). This paper reviews the history of this evolution and the important potential advantages and disadvantages of changes being contemplated for DSM-5. The convergence of diagnostic approach in DSM-IV and ICD-10 provided a shared system that fostered a tremendous body of research. The changes proposed in DSM-5 may impact both research comparability and service eligibility.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersDisease ProgressionHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesautismdiagnosisDSM-5

Identifiers

PMID23226949
PMCPMC3513678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.