Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23226893›Full record

Trial reportBulletin of the World Health Organization2012

Economic evaluation of a task-shifting intervention for common mental disorders in India.

Christine Buttorff, Rebecca S Hock, Helen A Weiss, Smita Naik, Ricardo Araya, Betty R Kirkwood, Daniel Chisholm, Vikram Patel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readControlled Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05395312 (Evaluation of Blended Stepped-care Mental Well-being Intervention for Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05395312 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Blended Stepped-care Mental Well-being Intervention for Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2023Enrolled360ConditionsMental Well-being, Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Wellness 1ArmsOnline blended stepped-care mental well-being platform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A meta-analysis of the effect of therapist experience on outcomes for clients with internalizing disorders.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Task-Sharing Approaches to Improve Mental Health Care in Rural and Other Low-Resource Settings: A Systematic Review.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christine ButtorffDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Rebecca S Hock
Helen A Weiss
Smita Naik
Ricardo Araya
Betty R Kirkwood
Daniel Chisholm
Vikram Patel

Funding

PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32MH014592 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HEATHER E VOLK, Peter P. Zandi · 1985 to 2026
$8.5M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH014592Wellcome Trust 091834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo carry out an economic evaluation of a task-shifting intervention for the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders in primary-care settings in Goa, India.

methodsCost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses based on generalized linear models were performed within a trial set in 24 public and private primary-care facilities. Subjects were randomly assigned to an intervention or a control arm. Eligible subjects in the intervention arm were given psycho-education, case management, interpersonal psychotherapy and/or antidepressants by lay health workers. Subjects in the control arm were treated by physicians. The use of health-care resources, the disability of each subject and degree of psychiatric morbidity, as measured by the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule, were determined at 2, 6 and 12 months.

findingsComplete data, from all three follow-ups, were collected from 1243 (75.4%) and 938 (81.7%) of the subjects enrolled in the study facilities from the public and private sectors, respectively. Within the public facilities, subjects in the intervention arm showed greater improvement in all the health outcomes investigated than those in the control arm. Time costs were also significantly lower in the intervention arm than in the control arm, whereas health system costs in the two arms were similar. Within the private facilities, however, the effectiveness and costs recorded in the two arms were similar.

conclusionWithin public primary-care facilities in Goa, the use of lay health workers in the care of subjects with common mental disorders was not only cost-effective but also cost-saving.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersCommunity Health WorkersCommunity Mental Health ServicesCost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsDepressive DisorderHumansIndiaLinear ModelsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSick LeaveWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID23226893
PMCPMC3506405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.