ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2012
Detecting KRAS mutations in peripheral blood of colorectal cancer patients by peptide nucleic acid clamp PCR.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diagnostic accuracy of circulating free DNA for the detection of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Peptide Nucleic Acid-Based Biosensors for Cancer Diagnosis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Effectiveness of circulating tumor DNA for detection of KRAS gene mutations in colorectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.OncoTargets and therapy · 2017Article
- Diagnostic RAS mutation analysis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).Biomolecular detection and quantification · 2016Article
- KRAS mutations in tumor tissue and plasma by different assays predict survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the effectiveness of peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamp PCR for detecting KRAS mutations in peripheral blood samples of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We compared KRAS point mutations between tumour tissue and blood samples. Forty-two patients were included in this study. We observed KRAS mutations in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues by PCR direct sequencing and in blood samples by PNA clamp PCR. KRAS point mutations were detected in primary tumour tissue samples of 13 patients (31.0%) and in peripheral blood samples of 10 patients (23.8%). KRAS point mutations were detected in both samples for 8 patients (19.0%). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for detecting KRAS mutations in peripheral blood and tumour tissue samples were 61.5, 93.1 and 83.3%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 80.0 and 84.4%, respectively. Five patients with mutant KRAS in their plasma preoperatively, did not exhibit KRAS mutations postoperatively. Our method detected KRAS point mutations in peripheral blood samples of CRC patients, which contained extremely small amounts of mutant cells. This method is helpful for identifying metastatic CRC patients in whom metastases will respond to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibody therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.