Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23226538›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Stem cell-like differentiation potentials of endometrial side population cells as revealed by a newly developed in vivo endometrial stem cell assay.

Kaoru Miyazaki, Tetsuo Maruyama, Hirotaka Masuda, Akiko Yamasaki, Sayaka Uchida, Hideyuki Oda, Hiroshi Uchida, Yasunori Yoshimura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pathogenesis of Endometriosis and Endometriosis-Associated Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Bioengineering of the Uterus.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The Elusive Endometrial Epithelial Stem/Progenitor Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Endometriosis and nuclear receptors.Human reproduction update · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaoru MiyazakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuo Maruyama
Hirotaka Masuda
Akiko Yamasaki
Sayaka Uchida
Hideyuki Oda
Hiroshi Uchida
Yasunori Yoshimura
Keio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometrial stem/progenitor cells contribute to the cyclical regeneration of human endometrium throughout a woman's reproductive life. Although the candidate cell populations have been extensively studied, no consensus exists regarding which endometrial population represents the stem/progenitor cell fraction in terms of in vivo stem cell activity. We have previously reported that human endometrial side population cells (ESP), but not endometrial main population cells (EMP), exhibit stem cell-like properties, including in vivo reconstitution of endometrium-like tissues when xenotransplanted into immunodeficient mice. The reconstitution efficiency, however, was low presumably because ESP cells alone could not provide a sufficient microenvironment (niche) to support their stem cell activity. The objective of this study was to establish a novel in vivo endometrial stem cell assay employing cell tracking and tissue reconstitution systems and to examine the stem cell properties of ESP through use of this assay. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsESP and EMP cells isolated from whole endometrial cells were infected with lentivirus to express tandem Tomato (TdTom), a red fluorescent protein. They were mixed with unlabeled whole endometrial cells and then transplanted under the kidney capsule of ovariectomized immunodeficient mice. These mice were treated with estradiol and progesterone for eight weeks and nephrectomized. All of the grafts reconstituted endometrium-like tissues under the kidney capsules. Immunofluorescence revealed that TdTom-positive cells were significantly more abundant in the glandular, stromal, and endothelial cells of the reconstituted endometrium in mice transplanted with TdTom-labeled ESP cells than those with TdTom-labeled EMP cells. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We have established a novel in vivo endometrial stem cell assay in which multi-potential differentiation can be identified through cell tracking during in vivo endometrial tissue reconstitution. Using this assay, we demonstrated that ESP cells differentiated into multiple endometrial lineages in the niche provided by whole endometrial cells, indicating that ESP cells are genuine endometrial stem/progenitor cells.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAdultAnimalsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2BiomarkersCell LineageCell MembraneCell ProliferationCell SeparationColony-Forming Units AssayEndometriumFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiceABCG2 protein, humanATP-Binding Cassette TransportersATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2BiomarkersNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23226538
PMCPMC3514174
OpenAlexW2145272005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.