Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23226349›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2012

Segregation of lexical and sub-lexical reading processes in the left perisylvian cortex.

Franck-Emmanuel Roux, Jean-Baptiste Durand, Mélanie Jucla, Emilie Réhault, Marion Reddy, Jean-François Démonet

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Neurosurgical Functional Dissection of the Middle Precentral Gyrus during Speech Production.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current Controversies on Wernicke's Area and its Role in Language.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. A trade-off between somatosensory and auditory related brain activity during object naming but not reading.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Franck-Emmanuel RouxUMR Unité 825, Faculté Paul Sabatier, IFR 96, Toulouse, France. franck_emmanuel.roux@yahoo.fr
Jean-Baptiste Durand
Mélanie Jucla
Emilie Réhault
Marion Reddy
Jean-François Démonet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental issue in cognitive neuroscience is the existence of two major, sub-lexical and lexical, reading processes and their possible segregation in the left posterior perisylvian cortex. Using cortical electrostimulation mapping, we identified the cortical areas involved on reading either orthographically irregular words (lexical, "direct" process) or pronounceable pseudowords (sublexical, "indirect" process) in 14 right-handed neurosurgical patients while video-recording behavioral effects. Intraoperative neuronavigation system and Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) stereotactic coordinates were used to identify the localization of stimulation sites. Fifty-one reading interference areas were found that affected either words (14 areas), or pseudo-words (11 areas), or both (26 areas). Forty-one (80%) corresponded to the impairment of the phonological level of reading processes. Reading processes involved discrete, highly localized perisylvian cortical areas with individual variability. MNI coordinates throughout the group exhibited a clear segregation according to the tested reading route; specific pseudo-word reading interferences were concentrated in a restricted inferior and anterior subpart of the left supramarginal gyrus (barycentre x = -68.1; y = -25.9; z = 30.2; Brodmann's area 40) while specific word reading areas were located almost exclusively alongside the left superior temporal gyrus. Although half of the reading interferences found were nonspecific, the finding of specific lexical or sublexical interferences is new evidence that lexical and sublexical processes of reading could be partially supported by distinct cortical sub-regions despite their anatomical proximity. These data are in line with many brain activation studies that showed that left superior temporal and inferior parietal regions had a crucial role respectively in word and pseudoword reading and were core regions for dyslexia.

Indexed as

Brain MappingReadingAdultAgedBrainBrain NeoplasmsDeep Brain StimulationFemaleHumansIntraoperative PeriodMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Sparing TreatmentsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23226349
PMCPMC3511309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.